
Springer Link
Emerald Insight
ProQuest
Sage Journals
Loc.gov
IntechOpen
Asce Library
ScienceDirect provides subscription-based access to a large database of scientific and medical...

GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
openDesktop.org
Gitea
Launchpad.net
OSOR
The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ScienceDirect seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 20 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | sciencedirect.com | sourceforge.net |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of ScienceDirect yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
ScienceDirect Quick Tutorial Video
More videos
Presearch Privacy Review #27 - Sourceforge
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using ScienceDirect and SourceForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of ScienceDirect yet. Be the first one to post
SourceForge is a great place for people who like open-source software. It offers a strong platform where you can find, review, and handle software, all while helping the open-source community.
SourceForge’s user interface works fine, but it could do with a modern overhaul to make it easier on the eye and give it a more intuitive feel. While it has a large community, SourceForge’s support is not as extensive...
Sourceforge has been around longer than most, and it has the projects to prove it. Lots of open source Linux, Windows and Mac projects are hosted on SF. It has a totally different project structure when compared with...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


You can research some more in those two sites (especially in sciencedirect.com, you can filter by open studies if you are broke like me). Source: over 3 years ago
That's incorrect. You also need to get some better sources. EPA.gov, the ICCT report, and sciencedirect.com are highly political institutions. Source: over 3 years ago
First of all, sciencedirect.com is not a peer reviewed science site. it gets a 2 out of 4 stars when rated by actual scientists. Source: almost 4 years ago
Tracking SourceForge since Mar 2021.
When comparing ScienceDirect and SourceForge, you can also consider the following products.

Springer Link is a website offering access to millions of articles, research papers, books, and journals to researchers and students.
Compare Springer Link to ScienceDirect or SourceForge:

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to ScienceDirect or SourceForge:

Emerald Insight is a website that offers you thousands of books, articles, journals, and research papers on virtually all subjects from physical sciences such as physics and chemistry, to life sciences such as botany and zoology.
Compare Emerald Insight to ScienceDirect or SourceForge:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to ScienceDirect or SourceForge:

ProQuest is a website that serves as an online educational hub where you can get eBooks, journals, research papers, articles, and even audios, videos, historical news, and magazines on any topic, subject, or fields such as physical sciences, health …
Compare ProQuest to ScienceDirect or SourceForge:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to ScienceDirect or SourceForge: