Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Save Text To File VS CopyQ

Compare Save Text To File VS CopyQ and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Save Text To File logo Save Text To File

Saves highlighted text to a file in the specified directory

CopyQ logo CopyQ

CopyQ : Clipboard Manager with Advanced Features.
  • Save Text To File Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04
  • CopyQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

Save Text To File features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CopyQ features and specs

  • Multi-Platform Support
    CopyQ is available on Windows, Linux, and macOS, offering wide compatibility across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source application, CopyQ is free to use and allows users to modify the source code to fit their needs.
  • Feature-Rich
    CopyQ includes a variety of features such as tabbed items, scripting capabilities, and advanced command-line options, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Customizable
    The application allows extensive customization of shortcuts, themes, and commands to cater to individual user preferences.
  • Integrated Search
    CopyQ has a powerful search functionality that makes it easy to find specific clipboard items quickly.
  • Item Management
    The software allows users to organize clipboard items into tabs for better management and categorization.
  • Plugins
    CopyQ supports plugins, which extend its functionality and allow integration with other tools and services.

Possible disadvantages of CopyQ

  • Complexity
    The abundance of features and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Resource Intensive
    CopyQ can consume a significant amount of system resources, particularly when handling a large number of clipboard items.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the user interface to be less intuitive or dated compared to other clipboard managers.
  • Inconsistent Updates
    While CopyQ is actively maintained, updates and new features may not be as frequent or consistent as some users would prefer.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Advanced configuration options might require technical knowledge, making it less accessible for non-technical users.
  • Lack of Cloud Sync
    CopyQ does not inherently support cloud synchronization, which could be a drawback for users who wish to sync their clipboard data across multiple devices.

Save Text To File videos

No Save Text To File videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CopyQ videos

+ Add

CopyQ text snippet manager

More videos:

  • Review - CopyQ Clipboard Manager
  • Review - CopyQ search your clipboard history and paste from the past

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Save Text To File and CopyQ)

Save Text To File

CopyQ

Clipboard Manager
5 5%
Clipboard Manager
95% 95
Bookmarks
7 7%
Bookmarks
93% 93
Mac
4 4%
Mac
96% 96
Note Taking
100 100%
Note Taking
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Save Text To File and CopyQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Save Text To File and CopyQ, you can also consider the following products

Clipjump - Clipjump : The Ultimate Clipboard Manager for Windows

Ditto - Easy to use interface; Search and paste previous copy entries; Keep multiple computer's clipboards in sync; Data is encrypted when sent over the network; Accessed from tray icon or global hot key; Select entry by double click, enter key or drag drop…

CopyPaste Pro - CopyPaste is like Time Machine for your Clipboard!

Maccy - Lightweight open-source clipboard manager for macOS

Clipy - Clipy is a clipboard extension for macOS.

Clipman - Clipman is a clipboard manager for Xfce.

Loading...