
Sanctions Check by Ixsight
BitOK
SanctionsLookup
Koinly
KyrosAML
OpenSanctions
complead
Crypto AML wallet screening, KYT API workflows, Telegram checks, graph context, and evidence-led reports for compliance teams. Crypto AML screening with verifiable evidence, not just a score.

Tricount
Settle Up
Splid
Spliit
YNAB
ihatemoney
Splitser
Splitwise is a free tool for friends and roommates to track bills and other shared expenses, so that everyone gets paid back. On the web, iPhone, and Android!

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | sanctuary.cv | splitwise.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United Kingdom · 2025 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Sanctuary is crypto AML screening for the people who actually move the money: exchangers, OTC desks, P2P traders and Web3 platforms. Paste a wallet address, get a risk score, a verdict and the evidence behind it in about 2 seconds. Every check runs against OFAC, EU, UN and UK HMT sanctions lists,...
No description of Splitwise yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Sanctuary.cv yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Sanctuary.cv videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Splitwise - iPhone App Review! [2020]
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Sanctuary.cv and Splitwise.
Sanctuary.cv's answer
Sanctuary shows the limits of its own knowledge. Every check reports how many of the applicable intelligence sources actually responded, and when coverage is thin the report says "verify independently" instead of showing a green screen. "We found nothing" and "this is clean" are different statements, and most tools quietly merge them. On top of that, every result comes as evidence rather than a bare number: entity attribution, source list, confidence, exposure distance in hops, all inside a PDF signed with Ed25519 and verifiable through a public link by anyone, without an account.
Sanctuary.cv's answer
Three reasons. Price and access: full sanctions screening against OFAC, EU, UN and UK HMT runs on every check including the free one, and paid plans start at $199 per month with no annual contract and no sales cycle. Defensibility: you get a signed report your counterparty, bank or exchange can verify, not a screenshot of a gauge. Reach: the same engine runs in the API, the web dashboard and the Telegram bot, so the compliance team, the developer and the trader on his phone all work from one source of truth instead of three different tools.
Sanctuary.cv's answer
Operators who move other people's money and have to answer for it. Crypto exchangers screening deposits before crediting, OTC desks documenting counterparties, P2P traders checking a wallet before releasing funds, payment platforms and Web3 businesses screening incoming transactions through the API, and small compliance teams that need case management and an audit trail without an enterprise budget. The common profile is someone who must decide in 90 seconds and explain that decision six months later to a bank or a regulator.
Sanctuary.cv's answer
The same scene kept repeating. Someone accepts a transfer, gets their exchange account frozen a week later, pays for a screening service and receives a screen with a number on it. Say 78. Then they ask what 78 means and get no answer: no sources, no distance to the problem, no share of funds, no date. A number you cannot argue with and cannot show to a compliance officer. So we started from the opposite end: first we defined the document that has to survive a dispute, then built the engine underneath it.
Sanctuary.cv's answer
We do not publish client names. Our users deal with frozen accounts, fraud disputes and counterparty risk, and being named as an AML customer is not something most of them want made public. By segment:
Share your experience with using Sanctuary.cv and Splitwise. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Sanctuary.cv yet. Be the first one to post
Splitwise is among the most commonly used group payment apps that can easily keep a systematic record of all your informal debts including restaurant bills, travel expenses, cost of accommodation, and much more. With...
Splitwise employs an intelligent algorithm to calculate the exact amount owed by each user. It shows who paid for what, how much amount was paid by each member, and any outstanding balances. Furthermore, the...
For example, shared items like appetizers would be split among the entire group or just a few people in the group. The app can handily accommodate large parties by allowing you to add up to 10 people to each group....
When comparing Sanctuary.cv and Splitwise, you can also consider the following products.

AML Sanctions Screening Software & Sanctions List Monitoring
Compare Sanctions Check by Ixsight to Sanctuary.cv or Splitwise:


Crypto portfolio tracker that helps get rid of AML and Tax issues
Compare BitOK to Sanctuary.cv or Splitwise:

SETTLE UP is an indispensable app for friends and flatmates who need to keep track of shared bills...
Compare Settle Up to Sanctuary.cv or Splitwise:

Sanctions screening API for fintech & payments. OFAC, EU, UN, UK, AU, Canada & Swiss. 15-min sync. ~200ms responses. Audit evidence. No names stored.
Compare SanctionsLookup to Sanctuary.cv or Splitwise:
