SaaSHub Reviews

1. peterhorne

   10 months ago

   Got some websites guidance from there and all of them are working well. Just now Saashub is in my top list for searching something genuine.

   👍 Pros:    Good quality

   👎 Cons:    No issues
2. KotovAle

   over 1 year ago
   good site

   I have been following this site for quite a long time, I found a lot of useful information about innovations and updates on different services. Also, SaaShab helped me find new tools for work

3. vlasovaalexanka

   over 1 year ago
   I'm very happy about this site

   thank you for such a great platform! This service was recommended to me by friends, he said “hey, you will find this product here, you will see what other people think about it” and yes, he was right, now I don’t leave your site because it helps me determine which tool is useful for me

Cppcheck Reviews

SaaSHub mentions (3)

• Someone is proxy-mirroring my website, can I do anything?

  A full-opaque box that states "You are visiting an illegally copied version of this site. Please go to 'saashub.com' for the correct version of the site." or similar. As an image, so it isn't modified by any scripting (at least initially). Removed by javascript on the legitimate page only. Source: over 3 years ago

• Someone is proxy-mirroring my website, can I do anything?

  Write a If-Statement "If the location is not saashub.com then fade to a clown picture". saashub.com is not in the javascript by plain it will be "constructed" by e.g. Casesar ciffre. Good luck by finding the replacement. Source: over 3 years ago

• SaaSHub - a software marketplace where users find product alternatives and software vendors showcase their products

  SaaSHub is an independent software marketplace. Its goal is to be objective, simple and your first stop when researching for a new service or product. SaaSHub helps end users finding product alternatives and allows software venders to showcase and promote their tech. Source: over 5 years ago

Cppcheck mentions (10)

• Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint

  I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

• Enforcing Memory Safety?

  Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago

• Static Code analysis

  For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago

• How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?

  Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago

• Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types

  Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago