Ruttl
Markup.io
Marker.io
Pastel
BugHerd
Userback
Usersnap
Fiidbakk
GitHub Enterprise
GitLab
GitHub
BitBucket
GitBucket
Gitea
Gerrit Code Review
SourceHut
To review fully developed websites, currently, people take screenshots, encircle design issues and share them in a word document or have long meetings with the developers to implement the changes. The average time required to review any page using such methods is over 3-4 hours alone, which makes such methods inefficient and time-consuming!
Thatโs why we built ruttl! Packed with powerful features, it allows users to add comments, edit content, track bugs, replace images, make design changes (& more) to web elements and share all kinds of changes needed to get implemented by developers. ruttl has streamlined the entire process of giving web design feedback and has become the favourite go-to design feedback tool for designers, developers, and agencies worldwide!
Ruttl GitHub EnterpriseBased on our record, GitHub Enterprise should be more popular than Ruttl. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Competitors There are a few competitors out there that do something very similar (see https://ruttl.com/, https://usepastel.com/, https://bugherd.com/, https://www.markup.io/). This seems to suggest that there seems to be a general market for such a product. Source: over 3 years ago
Ruttl.com โ The best all-in-one feedback tool to collect digital feedback and review websites, PDF's and images. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
Ruttl - Helps you leave comments directly on live websites. Source: almost 5 years ago
Here's the problem we were solving: we run GitHub Enterprise behind a VPN. Modern AI code review tools like Cursor, Github Copilot, and CodeRabbit expect cloud-hosted repos. We couldn't pipe proprietary code into them. But we still wanted AI code review on every PR. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Internal is a special visibility level used by GitHub Enterprise, allowing anyone inside your organization to see the repository, but nobody in the outside world. We generally suggest this as the default level for company projects that donโt have siloed sensitive information (such as customer-specific data or logic that only a specific group should know about). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
If the company you work for has subscribed to Github, you probably benefit from a more substantial offer with additional features (GitHub Team or GitHub Enterprise). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
Some orgs run GitHub Enterprise on-prem. Set up properly, it's not publicly accessible at all. Source: over 3 years ago
I do. My company has an enterprise license and it basically just acts as a private corner of normal public-facing github. Basically like a private repo but instead of being scoped to a single repo it's a full multi-organization scope. All new report default to private, but can be flipped to public if we want to open-source some internal project. Source: over 3 years ago
Markup.io - The easiest way to comment and share feedback on over 30 file types. Sign up for free, upload your content, drop a comment, and share for review. Yep, itโs that simple.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Marker.io - Visual feedback and bug reporting tool for websites
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Pastel - Sticky note-based feedback collection tool for live websites
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
