RunsOn VS Co-commit

Compare RunsOn VS Co-commit and see what are their differences

warmup.rocks

warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. featured

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Contents:

» Base Details
» Reviews
» Alternatives

RunsOn

Access the fastest and cheapest self-hosted runners on the market with a one-line change. Easily installable in your own AWS account. x64 and arm64 architectures supported.

Co-commit

Co-author commits on GitHub when pair programming.

10x cheaper GitHub Action runners //
2024-01-23
Cheaper AND faster than BuildJet / Warpbuild / GitHub //
2024-01-23

Cheap runners are just one part of the equation: nobody likes slow runs, even if it's cheap.

RunsOn gives you access to some of the fastest machines on the market, thanks to AWS extensive hardware selection.

Which makes RunsOn the fastest provider of self-hosted, fully ephemeral runners on the market.

We automatically build and publish copies of the official runner images at most 24h after their official release, so that you can be certain that your workflows will always work on either GitHub runners, or your own RunsOn runners.

Landing page //
2023-10-05

RunsOn

Website: runs-on.com
Pricing URL: Official RunsOn Pricing
$ Details: freemium €300.0 / Annually
Platforms: AWS GitHub
Release Date: 2024 January

Edit details

Co-commit

Website: github.com
Pricing URL: -
$ Details: -
Platforms: -
Release Date: -

Edit details

RunsOn features and specs

Ephemeral self-hosted runners
Autoscaling
Pricing
10x cheaper than competition

Co-commit features and specs

Collaboration Enhancement
Co-commit allows multiple contributors to be credited in a single commit, making collaboration more transparent and acknowledging all participants' efforts.
Improved Attribution
By supporting co-authorship, it ensures proper attribution of work, which can encourage more contributions and foster a healthier project environment.
Better History Tracking
Having multiple authors listed on a commit can provide clearer insights into who contributed to a particular piece of code, enhancing project documentation and accountability.

Possible disadvantages of Co-commit

Complexity in Git Management
Introducing co-authors in commits might complicate git history management for those unfamiliar with the feature, potentially leading to confusion.
Limited Adoption
As it's dependent on using specific tooling for co-author management, its benefits might be limited if not widely adopted across a team or project.
Tool Dependency
Relying on an additional tool introduces dependency, which may not be ideal for projects aiming for minimal external dependencies or those with strict toolchain policies.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RunsOn and Co-commit)

RunsOn

Co-commit

Developer Tools

73 73%

Developer Tools

27% 27

GitHub

100 100%

GitHub

0% 0

IDE

0 0%

IDE

100% 100

Code Collaboration

100 100%

Code Collaboration

0% 0

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing RunsOn and Co-commit.

What makes your product unique?

RunsOn's answer

10x cheaper than GitHub official runners. Runs in your own AWS account. More secure than sharing your secrets with other third-party tools like BuildJet or Warpbuild.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

RunsOn's answer

Cheap, fast, on-premise alternative to maintaining self-hosted runners.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

RunsOn's answer

CTO / Senior developers

What's the story behind your product?

RunsOn's answer

Built a similar product for one of my clients, reduced CI build cost by 10 times, and improve build speed from 1h to 20min.

User comments

Share your experience with using RunsOn and Co-commit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RunsOn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RunsOn mentions (11)

Surprise Pay $1000
If you want a 'fixed' cost option for GitHub self hosted runners on your AWS I can't recommend https://runs-on.com/ enough. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
GitHub Actions down again today
There are a couple and have very good reputation - though I've never used them https://www.blacksmith.sh/ They also say that they're much cheaper than github. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
GitHub Actions is the weakest link
My team has been using https://runs-on.com/ for AWS instance runners, had a few glitches but largely been great for using AWS instances for runners. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
GitHub Actions Is Slowly Killing Your Engineering Team
> You know how I know GitHub’s runners are bad? Because there’s an entire cottage industry of companies whose sole product is “GitHub Actions, but the runners don’t suck.” Namespace, Blacksmith, Actuated, Runs-on, BuildJet He's not wrong. Buildjet just announced they were shutting down though, citing recent improvements to the GitHub Actions platform. For the record I maintain the Runs-on [1] he's talking about,... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
Pricing Changes for GitHub Actions
I am developing a self-hosted solution for this [1]. It’s true that it’s somewhat of a pain but JIT runners allow a lot of flexibility that we don’t find elsewhere. [1] https://runs-on.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

Co-commit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Co-commit yet. Tracking of Co-commit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RunsOn and Co-commit, you can also consider the following products

Forgejo - Forgejo is a self-hosted lightweight software forge. Easy to install and low maintenance, it just does the job.

Tuple - Tuple is a Mac-only remote pair programming tool for discerning developers

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

USE Together - Collaborative screen sharing with multiple mouse cursors

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Gitmoji - An emoji guide for your GitHub commit messages

USE Together vs RunsOn

USE Together vs Co-commit