Software Alternatives & Startups

RunCat VS psutil

Compare RunCat VS psutil and see what are their differences

RunCat

This cat runs at the speed according to the CPU usage of your Mac. By looking at its running, you can see how much your CPU load is.

Rating
0 reviews
psutil

psutil is a module providing an interface for retrieving information on all running processes and...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, psutil seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Monitoring Tools popularity
32% vs 68%
alternatives listed
178 vs 46

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

RC
RunCat
psutil
Website macmenubar.com github.com
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

RC
RunCat 4 features
psutil 5 features
  • Visual Performance Indicator
    RunCat provides a unique visual cue for system performance by animating the speed of a running cat icon in the menu bar based on CPU usage, making it easy to notice at a glance.
  • Minimalistic Design
    The software integrates seamlessly into the macOS menu bar with a simple and clean design, ensuring it does not clutter the user interface or require much screen real estate.
  • Low System Resource Usage
    RunCat itself uses very little system resources, ensuring that it doesn't add to the load on your CPU while monitoring it.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize the appearance and speed of the running cat icon, allowing for a personalized touch to the monitoring tool.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    While it provides a fun and unique way to monitor CPU usage, RunCat doesn't offer detailed performance statistics or advanced monitoring features found in more comprehensive system tools.
  • Distracting for Some Users
    The continuously moving cat icon might be distracting to some users who are more comfortable with static indicators or prefer a less animated interface.
  • Single-Platform Availability
    RunCat is designed specifically for macOS, limiting its availability to users of other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Requires Manual Updates
    Users need to manually check for and update the software to access new features or improvements, which can be inconvenient compared to apps with automatic update functionality.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Psutil is designed to work across different operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, providing a unified API for system monitoring.
  • Comprehensive Functionality
    It offers a wide range of features for monitoring system performance metrics such as CPU usage, memory, disks, network, and system sensors.
  • Active Maintenance and Support
    Psutil is actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes, ensuring that it remains reliable and up-to-date with new system metrics and features.
  • Well-Documented
    The library comes with extensive documentation and examples, making it easier for developers to integrate and utilize its functionalities.
  • Pythonic API
    Psutil provides a clear and Pythonic interface, allowing Python developers to easily integrate system monitoring capabilities into their applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Resource Intensive
    While providing extensive monitoring capabilities, psutil can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting system performance when monitoring frequently or on resource-constrained systems.
  • Platform-Specific Limitations
    Some functionality may not be available on all platforms, requiring platform-specific considerations or workarounds in application development.
  • Requires Administrative Privileges
    Certain metrics and functionalities may require administrative privileges, potentially limiting usage in restricted environments or without proper permissions.
  • Version Compatibility
    There may be compatibility issues between different versions of psutil and Python, requiring careful management of dependencies in larger projects.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
RC
RunCat
psutil
32% 32%
68% 68%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
Mac
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using RunCat and psutil. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

RC
RunCat 0 mentions
psutil 1 mention

Tracking RunCat since Jun 2021.

  • Profiling Python code with memory_profiler
    It uses the psutil library (or can use tracemalloc or posix) to access process information in a cross platform way, so it works on Windows, Mac, and Linux. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

Alternatives to RunCat and psutil

When comparing RunCat and psutil, you can also consider the following products.