Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Run BASIC VS PowerBASIC

Compare Run BASIC VS PowerBASIC and see what are their differences

LiveSession
LiveSession helps you analyze users’ behavior, improve UX, find JS bugs, and increase conversion rates using session replays, and event-based product analytics. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Run BASIC logo Run BASIC

Run BASIC Personal Server is an all-in-one system that makes web programming easy and fun.

PowerBASIC logo PowerBASIC

PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.
  • Run BASIC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-05
  • PowerBASIC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18

Run BASIC features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

PowerBASIC features and specs

  • Performance
    PowerBASIC compiles to highly optimized machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal overhead.
  • Compact Executables
    The language is known for creating small and compact executables which are beneficial for performance and memory usage, especially in resource-constrained environments.
  • Legacy Support
    It is well-suited for maintaining and updating legacy BASIC applications, providing continuity for long-standing projects.
  • Low-Level Programming
    PowerBASIC offers direct access to system hardware and memory manipulation, which can be a significant advantage for system programmers.
  • Ease of Use
    The syntax is relatively straightforward, especially for those already familiar with BASIC, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of PowerBASIC

  • Limited Modern Features
    PowerBASIC lacks some of the modern programming constructs and libraries that are available in more contemporary programming languages.
  • Platform Limitations
    Primarily designed for Windows, PowerBASIC does not offer native support for other platforms, limiting cross-platform development capabilities.
  • Smaller User Community
    The user community for PowerBASIC is smaller compared to more popular languages, which can lead to fewer resources for support and collaboration.
  • Proprietary Nature
    As a proprietary product, PowerBASIC may involve licensing fees and does not offer the open-source flexibility that some developers prefer.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The development and release of updates are less frequent compared to more mainstream programming environments, potentially impacting feature availability and bug fixes.

Run BASIC videos

No Run BASIC videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

PowerBASIC videos

+ Add

PowerBasic demos - MSXturboR/GFX9000 - 1994

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Run BASIC and PowerBASIC)

Run BASIC

PowerBASIC

Programming Language
28 28%
Programming Language
72% 72
IDE
28 28%
IDE
72% 72
Text Editors
33 33%
Text Editors
67% 67
OOP
27 27%
OOP
73% 73

User comments

Share your experience with using Run BASIC and PowerBASIC. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Run BASIC and PowerBASIC, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

KBasic - KBasic is a powerful programming language, which is simply intuitive and easy to learn.

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

Liberty BASIC - Easy Programming for Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7, 8 and 10

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

B4J - 100% free development tool for cross platform desktop and server apps.

Loading...