RSpec
JUnit
Cucumber
PHPUnit
Arquillian
Capybara
TestNG
pytest
socketify.py
RSpec socketify.pyBased on our record, RSpec seems to be a lot more popular than socketify.py. While we know about 32 links to RSpec, we've tracked only 2 mentions of socketify.py. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
As someone who has always appreciated TDD and BDD practices, Since 2012 used RSpec or Cucumber and implemented BDD practices in major companies like AOL, BCC. I can get the ideas and concepts pretty quickly. At Superagentic AI, weโve applied similar principles to our own work, in particular through SuperOptiX and our SuperSpec DSL, which allows users to define agent specifications in a human-readable way and... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I am very comfortable with Minitest in Ruby. When I started to learn Rails, though, I was surprised by how different RSpec was. In case .NET testing is equally unlike the xUnit style, I should learn the idioms. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
It supports both RSpec and Minitest as well as any other testing gem. There are flexible configurations options which allow to configure editor with needed testing tool. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
I'm a huge supporter for TDD(Test Driven Development). Almost every piece code should be tested. During my co-op more than half of the time I spent writing test for my PR. I believe that experience really helped me understand the necessity of testing. I was surprised to see how similar the testing framework in JS and Ruby are. I used Jest which is very similar to RSpec I have used during my co-op. To mock http... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
The describe and it keywords are popularly used in other JavaScript testing frameworks to write and organize unit tests. This style originated in Ruby's Rspec testing library and is commonly known as spec-style testing. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago
JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks
Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.
Capybara - Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app.
TestNG - TestNG is a testing framework.