Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Cucumber VS RSpec

Compare Cucumber VS RSpec and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Cucumber logo Cucumber

Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

RSpec logo RSpec

RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.
  • Cucumber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-19
  • RSpec Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-09

Cucumber features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework
    Cucumber supports BDD, allowing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders to improve the quality of development through clear specifications.
  • Gherkin Syntax
    Utilizes the Gherkin language to write test cases in plain English, making them more readable and understandable for non-technical team members.
  • Integrates with Other Tools
    Easily integrates with other testing and development frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Selenium, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Cucumber allows for extensive customization and community support, reducing the cost of setting up a testing framework.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Offers support for various programming languages including Java, Ruby, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cucumber

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Requires a good understanding of both BDD practices and Cucumber’s structure, which might be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overheads
    Execution of Cucumber tests can be slower compared to other testing frameworks, making it less ideal for very large projects requiring fast feedback loops.
  • Verbose Code
    Writing tests in Gherkin can lead to more verbose code, which might require additional maintenance and can become cumbersome over time.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for integrating Cucumber with other testing frameworks can be complex, requiring careful coordination.
  • Not Ideal for Unit Testing
    Cucumber is more suited for acceptance and integration testing rather than unit testing, potentially necessitating additional tools for a comprehensive testing strategy.

RSpec features and specs

  • Readable Syntax
    RSpec's syntax is designed to be readable and expressive, making it easier for developers to write and understand tests without extensive background knowledge.
  • Behavior-Driven Development
    RSpec is tailored for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD), allowing developers to focus on the expected behavior of their applications and creating tests that reflect these behaviors.
  • Rich Set of Features
    RSpec provides a comprehensive set of features including test doubles, mocks, stubs, and the ability to test asynchronous code, which makes it versatile for a variety of testing needs.
  • Active Community
    With an active community and extensive documentation, RSpec offers plenty of resources for support and community-driven improvement.
  • Integration with Rails
    RSpec integrates seamlessly with Ruby on Rails applications, providing built-in configurations and generators that enhance productivity.

Possible disadvantages of RSpec

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Developers new to RSpec or BDD might face a learning curve as they become familiar with its unique concepts and syntax compared to more traditional testing frameworks.
  • Overhead for Small Projects
    For small or simple projects, RSpec might add unnecessary complexity or overhead compared to lighter testing frameworks, making it less efficient.
  • Performance
    RSpec can sometimes be slower in execution compared to other Ruby testing frameworks, particularly in large test suites or when running integration tests.
  • Customization Complexity
    While RSpec is highly customizable, the extensive configuration options can sometimes lead to complexity and make it harder to manage if not handled properly.
  • Dependency on Gems
    RSpec often requires additional gems for full functionality or integration with other tools, which can lead to dependency bloat and potential version conflicts.

Cucumber videos

+ Add

Madam Kilay Skin Magical Review / Orange cucumber review

More videos:

  • Review - Puff Bar - Cucumber Review (Best Disposable Vape Brand)
  • Review - THE CUCUMBER CHALLENGE! (1 MILLION SUBSCRIBER SPECIAL)
  • Tutorial - Cucumber automation suit

RSpec videos

No RSpec videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Cucumber and RSpec)

Cucumber

RSpec

Automated Testing
73 73%
Automated Testing
27% 27
Browser Testing
77 77%
Browser Testing
23% 23
Testing
78 78%
Testing
22% 22
Website Testing
100 100%
Website Testing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Cucumber and RSpec. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Cucumber and RSpec

Cucumber Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Cucumber itself is not a test automation tool but a framework that supports BDD. It is often used in conjunction with Selenium to provide a layer where test scenarios are written in a way that is understandable by all team members. Unlike Selenium, which focuses on automating browser actions, Cucumber focuses on defining behavior and can be used to drive Selenium tests.
Source: bugbug.io
5 Selenium Alternatives to Fill in Your Top Testing Gaps
Business testers are likely to prefer to use Cucumber over Selenium since script Cucumber lets you write test scenarios using a plain-English scripting language called Gherkin. Using Gherkin instead of code makes test script creation a much simpler process, since anyone can read, write, and understand the scripts regardless of testing experience.
Source: www.perfecto.io
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Cucumber is an open-source tool that is designed over the concept of BDD (Behavior-driven development). It is used to perform the automated acceptance testing by running the examples that best describe the behavior of the application. It gets you a single up-to-date living document that is having both specification and test documentation.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

RSpec Reviews

We have no reviews of RSpec yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RSpec seems to be a lot more popular than Cucumber. While we know about 31 links to RSpec, we've tracked only 1 mention of Cucumber. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Cucumber mentions (1)

RSpec mentions (31)

  • 30,656 Pages of Books About the .NET Ecosystem: C#, Blazor, ASP.NET, & T-SQL
    I am very comfortable with Minitest in Ruby. When I started to learn Rails, though, I was surprised by how different RSpec was. In case .NET testing is equally unlike the xUnit style, I should learn the idioms. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 3 useful VS Code extensions for testing Ruby code
    It supports both RSpec and Minitest as well as any other testing gem. There are flexible configurations options which allow to configure editor with needed testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Adding Jest To Explainer.js
    I'm a huge supporter for TDD(Test Driven Development). Almost every piece code should be tested. During my co-op more than half of the time I spent writing test for my PR. I believe that experience really helped me understand the necessity of testing. I was surprised to see how similar the testing framework in JS and Ruby are. I used Jest which is very similar to RSpec I have used during my co-op. To mock http... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Exploring the Node.js Native Test Runner
    The describe and it keywords are popularly used in other JavaScript testing frameworks to write and organize unit tests. This style originated in Ruby's Rspec testing library and is commonly known as spec-style testing. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Is the VCR plugged in? Common Sense Troubleshooting For Web Devs
    5. Automated Tests: Unit tests are automated tests that verify the behavior of a small unit of code in isolation. I like to write unit tests for every bug reported by a user. This way, I can reproduce the bug in a controlled environment and verify that the fix works as expected and that we wont see a regression. There are many different JavaScript test frameworks like Jest, cypress, mocha, and jasmine. We use... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Cucumber and RSpec, you can also consider the following products

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks

Arquillian - Arquillian is an open-source testing platform that offers no more container lifecycle, deployment hassles, and mocks.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Loading...