
RSpec
JUnit
Cucumber
PHPUnit
Arquillian
Capybara
TestNG
pytest
CodeceptJS
Cypress.io
Selenium
Playwright
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Testkit
BrowserStack
Testim
RSpec
CodeceptJSBased on our record, RSpec should be more popular than CodeceptJS. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
As someone who has always appreciated TDD and BDD practices, Since 2012 used RSpec or Cucumber and implemented BDD practices in major companies like AOL, BCC. I can get the ideas and concepts pretty quickly. At Superagentic AI, weโve applied similar principles to our own work, in particular through SuperOptiX and our SuperSpec DSL, which allows users to define agent specifications in a human-readable way and... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I am very comfortable with Minitest in Ruby. When I started to learn Rails, though, I was surprised by how different RSpec was. In case .NET testing is equally unlike the xUnit style, I should learn the idioms. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
It supports both RSpec and Minitest as well as any other testing gem. There are flexible configurations options which allow to configure editor with needed testing tool. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I'm a huge supporter for TDD(Test Driven Development). Almost every piece code should be tested. During my co-op more than half of the time I spent writing test for my PR. I believe that experience really helped me understand the necessity of testing. I was surprised to see how similar the testing framework in JS and Ruby are. I used Jest which is very similar to RSpec I have used during my co-op. To mock http... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The describe and it keywords are popularly used in other JavaScript testing frameworks to write and organize unit tests. This style originated in Ruby's Rspec testing library and is commonly known as spec-style testing. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
But honestly, it may be preferable for you to use a single framework that does support both technologies (Web and Mobile) out of the box like webdriver.io or codecept. Source: over 3 years ago
There are different tools for visual screenshot testing, like BackstopJS, and Cypress.io also has a screenshot() function. In this series, I focus on writing tests with CodeceptJS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
CodeceptJS โ A wrapper for different tools in one interface. Language: JavaScript/TypeScript. Frameworks that are wrapped: Playwright, Webdriver.io, Puppeteer, Protractor, etc. The service also comes with a large community and is easy to install and use for e2e testing. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
I'm saddened codeceptJS wasn't even mentioned. It's easily better than most of the ones listed except Cypress. Source: over 3 years ago
Back when I was doing FE, I found https://codecept.io, which is the same concept as Cypress but with a Playwright driver. Have not used but thought it's worth a mention. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks
Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.