Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

rrweb VS UXtweak

Compare rrweb VS UXtweak and see what are their differences

rrweb logo rrweb

#1 open source session recording & replay library

UXtweak logo UXtweak

Online user testing and usability platform
  • rrweb Example recording of the rrweb dashboard
    Example recording of the rrweb dashboard //
    2026-07-21

Embeddable session replay infrastructure on the open source library the industry standardized on. Record and replay sessions inside your own product, through an unbranded SDK and API.

  • UXtweak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-05

Powerful research tools for improving usability of web sites and apps, from prototypes to production. Built for usability testing, information architecture research, and user behavior analytics at any stage of the development cycle. Easy implementation with GTM, GDPR and CCPA compliant. And most importantly, simple for respondents - no browser extension, downloading, or uploading anything. We provide our users with unmoderated usability testing, session recordings with advanced filters, heatmaps and activity tracking, tree testing, card sorting, and so much more packed into one simple to use platform.

UXtweak

$ Details
freemium
Release Date
2019 January
Startup details
Country
Slovakia
City
Bratislava
Employees
10 - 19

rrweb features and specs

  • Full Video Recording Capability
    rrweb can record and replay the whole web app experience through videos, allowing for comprehensive playback of user interactions.
  • High Fidelity Replays
    It captures almost all kinds of interactions and DOM state changes, offering very accurate reproduction of user sessions.
  • Event Compression
    The tool employs efficient event compression techniques, reducing the size of data files while maintaining detailed interactions.
  • Modular Architecture
    Its modular architecture allows developers to customize and extend functionalities according to specific needs by adding or removing plugins.
  • Open Source
    rrweb is open source, making it accessible for anyone to use, modify, or contribute to, which fosters a collaborative development environment.

UXtweak features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    UXtweak offers a wide range of tools for usability testing, including session recordings, heatmaps, surveys, and card sorting, providing a complete suite for UX research needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform's intuitive design makes it easy for both beginners and advanced users to navigate and utilize the features effectively.
  • Real-Time Analytics
    UXtweak provides real-time data and analytics, allowing teams to quickly assess user behaviors and make informed decisions.
  • Customization Options
    The tool offers extensive customization options, enabling users to tailor tests and surveys according to specific project requirements.
  • Collaboration Features
    With collaborative features, team members can easily share insights and feedback, facilitating better teamwork and project management.

Possible disadvantages of UXtweak

  • Pricing Model
    For small businesses or individual designers, the pricing might be on the higher side compared to some competitors, potentially limiting accessibility.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, new users might experience a learning curve when exploring the full range of features.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    The platform may have fewer integrations with other tools and software compared to some other UX solutions, which might require additional effort for comprehensive data utilization.
  • Performance on Large Data Sets
    Some users might experience slower performance or delays when handling very large data sets or complex projects.
  • Mobile Testing Limitations
    Certain mobile testing functionalities might be less robust, potentially affecting the quality of insights for mobile-centric projects.

rrweb videos

No rrweb videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

UXtweak videos

UXtweak: a powerful UX Research tools for UI/UX Designers

More videos:

  • Review - UXtweak Website Testing - The easiest way to test your website
  • Review - 3 UX research methods to help you empathise with your users with UXtweak

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to rrweb and UXtweak)
Web Analytics
48 48%
52% 52
User Experience
22 22%
78% 78
Heatmaps
100 100%
0% 0
Usability Testing
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing rrweb and UXtweak.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

rrweb's answer

Most session replay vendors are building on the engine we maintain. Choosing rrweb means owning that layer directly.

What that gets you in practice: events are plain JSON, so you store them in your own S3, Postgres or stream, keep them in the EU, and delete them on your own schedule. There's no lock-in at the recorder, because if you leave rrweb Cloud your recordings still replay in an open source player. And the plugin API lets you capture things a closed SaaS recorder will never expose, including canvas, WebGL and custom event types.

Where a competitor wins: if you want replay bundled with product analytics, error monitoring and heatmaps in one dashboard, and you never want to think about infrastructure, a full suite like PostHog or Sentry does more out of the box. Several of them sponsor rrweb, and we'd rather people use the right tool than the closest one.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

rrweb's answer

Two groups.

Product engineers who need replay inside something they're already building: bug reporting, customer support tooling, QA, AI agent observability, interactive demos. They install the library, own the pipeline, and want format-level control.

Platform teams at companies whose product is replay, or includes it. Observability vendors, analytics suites, co-browsing and customer experience tools. They embed rrweb as the capture layer instead of writing a recorder from scratch, which takes years to get right across browsers, shadow DOM, canvas, iframes and web components.

What's the story behind your product?

rrweb's answer

rrweb started in 2018 as one engineer's side project. Yanzhen Yu wanted to record and replay what users actually did in a browser, and published the result under MIT. There's a short documentary about how it came together, in Chinese with English subtitles.

Adoption moved faster than anyone planned for. A core team formed around the project in 2020, and Justin Halsall (Amsterdam), Eoghan Murray (Dublin) and Yun Feng (San Francisco) maintain it today alongside more than 100 contributors. The library now sits at close to 20,000 stars and powers the replay features inside some of the largest observability and analytics products on the market.

The awkward part of that success is that an MIT library carrying replay for billion-dollar companies was still being maintained on evenings and weekends. rrweb Cloud exists to fix that. It's the hosted version of the project, built by the maintainers, based in Amsterdam, and the logic is simple: revenue from Cloud pays for maintainer time on the open source library.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

rrweb's answer

The library is roughly 89% TypeScript, deliberately so. Record and replay share a strongly typed event schema, and those types are the contract between the two sides. The remainder is JavaScript, HTML test fixtures, and Svelte for the player UI.

Four packages:

rrweb-snapshot, which serializes the DOM and its state into a JSON tree and rebuilds it rrweb, the record and replay functions rrdom, a virtual DOM that makes replay faster and testable headlessly rrweb-player, the player UI

Underneath it leans on browser primitives: MutationObserver for DOM changes, event listeners for input, scroll and pointer activity, CSSOM for stylesheet state, and patched canvas contexts for 2D and WebGL capture. Events are plain JSON, optionally packed for transport.

Build and test tooling is Yarn, Turborepo, Vite, Vitest, Puppeteer for integration tests, and Changesets for releases. MIT licensed throughout.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

rrweb's answer

Sentry Datadog PostHog Amplitude Mixpanel New Relic Pendo Highlight Browserbase StatCounter Requestly Gleap Bird Eats Bug Navattic CUX UXWizz Analyzee SmartX

Sentry, PostHog, Pendo and Highlight also fund the project as sponsors on OpenCollective.

What makes your product unique?

rrweb's answer

rrweb is the recording engine most session replay products are built on. Sentry, PostHog, Pendo, Highlight, Mixpanel, Datadog, Amplitude and New Relic all ship replay built on rrweb or its approach.

It serializes the DOM into a typed JSON event stream: one full snapshot, then timestamped incremental mutations. There is no video. Replay rebuilds the actual page in a browser, so text stays selectable, CSS re-renders at any viewport, and a three-minute session weighs kilobytes instead of megabytes. Because the output is structured JSON, an LLM can read a session directly without a vision model in the loop.

It's MIT licensed with close to 20,000 GitHub stars, so the capture layer is yours to own. rrweb Cloud is the hosted backend from the same maintainers, for teams who don't want to run ingestion, storage and replay infrastructure themselves.

User comments

Share your experience with using rrweb and UXtweak. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare rrweb and UXtweak

rrweb Reviews

We have no reviews of rrweb yet.
Be the first one to post

UXtweak Reviews

Maze vs UXtweak: Which is the better tool?
👀 Looking to Switch to UXtweak but Locked into Maze subscription? If you’re currently subscribed to Maze but want to explore what UXtweak has to offer, we have a special deal for you! We will provide free access to UXtweak for the remaining duration of your Maze subscription. No need to worry about extra costs or initiating a new procurement process. Simply reach out to us...
UXtweak vs Optimal Workshop
Both UXtweak and Optimal Workshop offer heatmaps, however, they are slightly different. UXtweak offers you pretty complex heatmaps with the visualization of mouse movements, mouse clicks, and taps. UXtweak also offers you scroll maps, which is a variant of heatmaps showing how far down the visitors have scrolled down the page.
Best 8 Affordable UserZoom Alternatives in 2023
You may also choose between a pro plan for only 70€ per month or a custom plan tailored to your specific requirements. UXtweak is one of the most cost-effective usability testing tools available, according to these figures, making it a great UserZoom option.
UserTesting vs UserZoom: Pick the right user research software in 2022
UXtweak is an alternative to UserTesting and UserZoom. It is an all-in-one UX research platform full of powerful tools for improving the usability of websites and apps, from prototypes to production. It is designed for usability testing, information architecture research, and user behavior analytics at any stage of the development cycle – helping you create products people...
5 Best UXtweak Alternatives
UXtweak is one of the most complex research tools offering many features under one hood. A great plus is that even with a free plan you have unlimited studies – this means you can test and test as much as you wish, hooray!

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UXtweak seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

rrweb mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rrweb yet. Tracking of rrweb recommendations started around Mar 2021.

UXtweak mentions (2)

  • Looking for volunteers to navigate a website and answer a few questions (over 18, any gender, UX design experience is not required but would provide great insight)
    I am looking for volunteers to navigate a website for a fashion brand and answer 4 quick questions at the end. The process is fast and is done through UXtweak.com and can be done anonymously. This is for a school project. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What tool do you guys use to test your prototypes?
    Have been using UXtweak for some of my latest projects on Figma and I’m very much satisfied. They have some great features and it’s easy to upload your designs too! But most importantly it's free, recommend checking them out uxtweak.com. Source: almost 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing rrweb and UXtweak, you can also consider the following products

Loom - Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

Smartlook - Qualitative analytics for websites and mobile apps Start understanding the 'whys' of your users' behaviors with clear, visual insights. With session recordings and event tracking, you get the complete picture.

Maze - Beautiful & actionable analytics for InVision prototypes

SessionStack - Record and replay web app issues. See them the way they happened to end users.

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!