Software Alternatives & Startups

Rows VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Rows VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Rows

The spreadsheet where teams work faster

Rating
0 reviews
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Rows should be more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.

social mentions
24 vs 6
Spreadsheets popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 132

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Rows
CrossBrowserTesting
Website rows.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing
Company Startup from Germany · 10 - 19 employees · 2016 —
Listed in

About Rows and CrossBrowserTesting

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Rows
CrossBrowserTesting

Slick design. Built-in integrations. Revolutionary sharing. Rows reinvented spreadsheets so teams do more, crazy fast.

Read more about Rows

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Rows 5 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Rows provides an intuitive and easy-to-use spreadsheet interface that is accessible for users of all skill levels, from beginners to advanced.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Supports a variety of integrations with other software services and APIs, allowing for seamless data import and export.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    Allows multiple users to work on the same spreadsheet simultaneously, enhancing team productivity and ensuring everyone has the latest information.
  • Customization and Automation
    Offers powerful automation features and the ability to write custom scripts, which can save time and reduce manual errors.
  • Template Library
    Provides a rich library of pre-designed templates that can help users quickly get started on common business tasks.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While user-friendly, more advanced features and scripting capabilities may require a significant learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Primarily a cloud-based tool, which means it relies heavily on internet connection and offers limited offline functionality.
  • Pricing
    The cost of premium features or larger scale deployments can be high, which may not be affordable for small businesses or individual users.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    Heavily reliant on third-party integrations, which means any issues or changes in connected services can impact Rows' functionality.
  • Security Concerns
    As with any cloud-based service, there may be concerns about data security and privacy, especially for sensitive or confidential information.
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Rows
CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Rows is considered a good tool, especially for those who need a blend of traditional spreadsheet capabilities enhanced with modern, cloud-based functionalities. Its powerful integration options and user-friendly interface make it a compelling choice for data-driven organizations.

Why this product is good

  • Rows (rows.com) is a spreadsheet tool that stands out due to its modern approach to data management and collaboration. It combines the familiarity of spreadsheet functionalities with powerful integrations and automation features. Users appreciate its ability to pull in data from various API services without requiring advanced technical skills, making it easier for teams to manage and analyze data collaboratively. The interface is intuitive and designed for seamless teamwork, enabling real-time updates and sharing capabilities.

Recommended for

  • Data analysts seeking a more intuitive way to integrate and analyze data.
  • Small businesses looking to streamline reporting and data-driven decision-making processes.
  • Teams that require collaborative and real-time updates on shared projects.
  • Individuals who are familiar with spreadsheet interfaces but lack advanced programming skills and need easy API integrations.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Rows 3 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Welcome to Rows

More videos

  • - The Truth about Barbell Rows (AVOID MISTAKES!)
  • - 9/21/21 bentover rows review

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Rows
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Rows and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Rows no reviews yet
CrossBrowserTesting no reviews yet
  • The best no-code tools for sales teams
    www.nocode.tech · Jul 2023

    You can bring your data to life. With Rows, you can jazz up your spreadsheets with slick charts, images, audio and even interactive features such as buttons and checkboxes. What’s more, you can share your spreadsheets...

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Rows 24 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

View more

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: about 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Rows and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing Rows and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.