Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Rev.com VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare Rev.com VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Rev.com logo Rev.com

Transcriptions, captions, and subtitles that are affordable, fast, and high-quality.

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • Rev.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Rev.com

Website
rev.com
$ Details
Release Date
2010 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Texas
City
Austin
Founder(s)
Dan Kokotov
Employees
250 - 499

Rev.com features and specs

  • Speed
    Rev.com offers fast turnaround times, often delivering transcriptions within 24 hours or less for standard files.
  • Accuracy
    Rev.com is known for its high accuracy rate in transcription services, often exceeding 99% accuracy for clear audio.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform has an intuitive interface, making it easy to upload files and receive completed transcriptions or captions.
  • Variety of Services
    Rev.com provides a range of services including transcription, captions, subtitles, and translations.
  • Human Transcription
    Rev relies primarily on human transcribers, which generally leads to higher accuracy compared to automated transcription services.
  • Customer Support
    Rev offers responsive customer service to help address issues or concerns promptly.

Possible disadvantages of Rev.com

  • Cost
    Rev.com is relatively more expensive than some competitors, with transcription costs at $1.50 per audio minute.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Since humans handle the transcriptions, there might be concerns regarding the privacy and confidentiality of sensitive information.
  • Audio Quality Dependence
    The accuracy of the transcription can significantly drop if the audio quality is poor or has background noise.
  • Manual Review
    Despite the high accuracy, manual review is sometimes necessary to ensure the transcription meets specific formatting or content requirements.
  • Limited Languages
    While Rev.com offers transcription in multiple languages, the variety is less extensive compared to some other providers.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of Rev.com

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Rev.com is considered a good service for those needing reliable transcription, captioning, and translation. It offers a combination of quality, speed, and cost-effectiveness, making it a favored option in the industry.

Why this product is good

  • Rev.com is renowned for its high-quality transcription, captioning, and translation services. It has built a strong reputation due to its accuracy, quick turnaround times, and competitive pricing. The platform employs a large network of professional freelancers to ensure that the work is done efficiently and to a high standard. User-friendly interface and customer support are additional factors that contribute to its positive reviews.

Recommended for

  • Content creators needing video captioning and subtitling.
  • Researchers and journalists requiring accurate transcriptions.
  • Businesses looking for translation services for documents or audio.
  • Podcasters and media producers who need quick and reliable transcription.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Rev.com videos

MAKING EASY MONEY ON REV.COM: Scam or Worth it?

More videos:

  • Review - HOW MUCH CAN YOU MAKE IN 1 WEEK ON REV? Rev.com Review (2019)
  • Review - Review of Rev.com: Is Rev Worth It?

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rev.com and CrossBrowserTesting)
Transcription
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Audio Transcription
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Rev.com and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Rev.com and CrossBrowserTesting

Rev.com Reviews

The 12 Best Notta.ai Alternatives for Better Transcription in 2024
Rev provides transcription, captioning, and subtitling services. It offers both AI-powered and human-generated solutions for converting speech to text. The platform aims to deliver fast, accurate, and cost-effective services for individuals, small teams, and large organizations.
Source: sonix.ai
Top 14 Sonix.ai Alternatives in 2025
While Sonix charges $22 per user per month plus $5 per hour fees, Rev's Max Subscription starts at $29.99 per user per month. This means if you want to transcribe 30 hours of media files, Sonix will cost around $172 ($22 + $5*30), whereas Rev will cost merely $29.99.
Source: www.notta.ai

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Rev.com seems to be a lot more popular than CrossBrowserTesting. While we know about 79 links to Rev.com, we've tracked only 6 mentions of CrossBrowserTesting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rev.com mentions (79)

  • Ryanair wins screen scraping case against Booking.com in US court ruling
    Minimum wage is not applicable for gig work. It would basically be the same business model as companies like https://rev.com, which can be <$1 per video transcribed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • **Unlocking Financial Freedom: Your Ultimate Guide to Making Money from Home**
    15. Transcription Services: If you have excellent listening and typing skills, transcription work can be a viable option. Platforms like TranscribeMe and Transcribe Speech to Text | Rev offer transcription gigs that allow you to earn money from home. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Can I automate text replacement?
    It seems like you could send it out to a translation company (like rev.com) and get a .srt that you could re-import back into Premiere. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWlm6ZCfdsQ. Source: about 3 years ago
  • I Wanna be rich
    Freelancing by learning a skill, but also subtitles on rev.com, and if you are proficient at more than one language, try for online (live) translation job. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Online work for someone in a 3rd world country?
    There are also things like rev.com or jobsforeditors.com or various other things like teaching english online. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rev.com and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

Otter.ai - Your AI meeting assistant that takes live notes and generates summaries and other insights using Meeting GenAI.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

One Hour Translation - Professional translation services for 75 languages on a 24/7 basis.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

HappyScribe - Happy Scribe automatically transcribes your interviews

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.