RepRaptor VS Tiny C Compiler
Compare RepRaptor VS Tiny C Compiler and see what are their differences
Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription
sponsored
RepRaptor
Hevy
RepDB
TrueCoach
Gym Log Track
Everfit
Strong.app
Reps.app
Tiny C Compiler
GNU Compiler Collection
LLVM
clang
MinGW
Scoop
SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem
QBE
RepRaptor is a community workout app for building, sharing, and running training programs. Publish a program to the discovery feed and anyone can find it and run it. Browse what the community has built, follow a program from your coach, or start from an official template.
Build two kinds of training. Classic programs run on weeks, days, exercises, sets, and rest for strength blocks, hypertrophy, and periodized plans. Circuit programs run on timed rounds for HIIT, EMOM, AMRAP, Tabata, and finishers. Every exercise pulls from a library of 1,796 moves, already tagged and searchable by muscle, equipment, or category, and you can edit any of them.
Coaches get a full platform. Build programs for clients, message them inside the app, bundle plans together, and share links that track which channel sends signups. An activity feed shows who's training and flags anyone quiet for a week. Pricing is flat with no fees per client.
Free for lifters. On iOS and web, with Android coming.
RepRaptor Tiny C CompilerRepRaptor's answer
RepRaptor does two things and skips the rest. You build training programs and you run them. No social feed, no marketplace taking a cut, no per client billing. Coaches pay one flat monthly rate no matter how many clients they carry. The same app handles structured strength blocks and timed circuits, and anyone can publish a program to the community for others to run.
RepRaptor's answer
Most coaching platforms charge per client or take a percentage of what you earn. RepRaptor is built the other way:
RepRaptor's answer
Training apps kept piling on things that had nothing to do with training. Social feeds, badges, upsells, per client fees that punished coaches for growing. RepRaptor started as the opposite. Strip it down to building and running programs, keep lifters free, and charge coaches one flat rate. It is built by a solo developer who wanted a clean tool for finding and following good programs.
RepRaptor's answer
RepRaptor serves two main groups, plus the creators who sit between them:
Creators sit in between, publishing programs to the community for anyone to run.
RepRaptor's answer
Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
> I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
"Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Hevy - Simple workout logging, insightful analytics, and a growing community of gym athletes.
GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...
RepDB - Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription
LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...
TrueCoach - TrueCoach is a reputable personal trainer software that makes your life easy via promoting your business to an extreme level with serving less time.
clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.