Hevy | Senior Mobile Engineer | Remote | Full-time | https://hevyapp.com We’re looking for a lead mobile/full-stack engineer to join our team. You’ll take full technical ownership of a mobile+web app used by +2 million users. You’ll architect and implement features, and lead a small team of developers. Our tech stack includes: React, React-Native, iOS, Android, Next.js, Node.js, express.js, Postgres. Learn more... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

Hevyapp.com lol, if you log into your account you should be met with a web interface for making routines. Source: about 3 years ago

On the web interface, your can nest your workouts into folder so that they're easy to track and organize. For example if you're on a PPL 6 week meso-cycle you can create every workout for the next 6 weeks on hevy.com . But once synced to the Apple Watch the folders just become a flat list which you have to scroll through to find the right workout. Would be nice if folder structure transferred to apple watch . Source: about 4 years ago

Hey oneman_aus! No known memory issues at the moment. Would you mind reaching out to me so I can investigate the issue further? Desmond at hevyapp.com. Source: over 4 years ago

Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

> I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

"Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago