We moved our services to Render and can't be happier!
Based on our record, Render seems to be a lot more popular than HatchBox. While we know about 420 links to Render, we've tracked only 22 mentions of HatchBox. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Render - I think render is more like a cloud agnostic builder/runner platform, this means that your application needs to be hosted somewhere else. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
Next, we'll deploy our ecommerce website to Vercel (which is a great choice to host your Next.js website). Other hosting options include Netlify and Render. - Source: dev.to / 28 days ago
1) Render.com currently offers postgres databases for $7 a month. The $7 instance is pretty weak as far as RAM and CPU, and their prices also get pretty unreasonable after that. However, this is a quick setup and cheaper alternative to Neon. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
I use Cloudflare Serverless for front end apps and Render for backend services. - Cloudflare [1] scales easily and has a lot of easy to use services like databases and storage buckets, JAM Stack front end pages, and CDN services for images and videos. - Render [2] has been great for us to spin up Python services quickly. I haven't worked with a production load on Render, but I hear good things :) [1]... - Source: Hacker News / 30 days ago
The journey of deploying an open-source software platform like forem can be complex and daunting, but with the right tools and services, it can also be remarkably rewarding. This article details my experience deploying Forem, the software behind the Dev.to, on Render.com, deploying Promptzone.com. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
- Hatchbox https://hatchbox.io They all manage infrastructure on your behalf within a larger Cloud Service Provider. One term I could think of is "DevOps as a Service" or "Platform Engineering as a Service". How would you call this? And what alternatives do you see? - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
This is a great idea. For our startup, we instead use Hatchbox [1]. It provides us with that one-click PaaS experience while allowing us to run on your preferred platform (AWS). [1] https://hatchbox.io. - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
Hatchbox is a deployment platform for Ruby-on-Rails. If you prefer, it's a Heroku competitor. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I think hatchbox.io is pretty much the best option. I also like fly.io though, pretty decent as well. Source: 12 months ago
Dont forget about Hatchbox by Chris Oliver at https://hatchbox.io/. Source: 12 months ago
Fly.io - Edge computing is the new frontier.
Cloud 66 - Everything you need to run your code on any cloud.
Railway - Made for any language, for projects big and small.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
LibHunt - LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.