Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Refactor.io VS Evil

Compare Refactor.io VS Evil and see what are their differences

Woopy
incident management, error monitoring, alerting, on-call, devops, developer tools, webhooks, mobile featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Refactor.io logo Refactor.io

Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Evil logo Evil

The extensible vi layer for Emacs.
Not present
  • Evil Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

Refactor.io features and specs

  • Code Sharing
    Refactor.io allows users to share code snippets easily, facilitating collaborative work and peer reviews.
  • Simplified Refactoring
    The platform aims to simplify the process of code refactoring, making it easier for developers to clean up and improve their code.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Refactor.io boasts a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, even for those who are not highly experienced with code refactoring tools.
  • Cloud-Based
    Being cloud-based, Refactor.io allows users to access their work from anywhere, making remote collaboration more efficient.
  • Integrations
    The platform offers integrations with various popular development tools and services, enhancing its utility in diverse development workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Refactor.io

  • Limited Language Support
    Refactor.io supports a limited range of programming languages, which might not be sufficient for developers working with less common languages.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance issues such as latency, which can be disruptive to the workflow.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any cloud-based service, there may be concerns about the privacy and security of the code snippets shared on the platform.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    For more experienced developers, the platform may lack some advanced features available in more comprehensive refactoring tools.
  • Dependency on Internet
    Since it is a cloud-based service, any issues with internet connectivity can hinder access to the platform and the ability to refactor code.

Evil features and specs

  • Vim Emulation
    Evil provides a near-complete emulation of Vimโ€™s features within Emacs, allowing users who are familiar with Vim to transition without losing their preferred keybindings and workflow.
  • Customizability
    Evil allows users to customize their configurations extensively, combining the powerful text-editing capabilities of Vim with the customizability of Emacs.
  • Community Support
    Evil has a large and active community, providing a wealth of plugins and resources to enhance the text editing experience.
  • Mode Integration
    Evil integrates smoothly with various Emacs major and minor modes, allowing users to leverage the full functionality of Emacs alongside Vim's modal editing.

Possible disadvantages of Evil

  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with Vim, the modal editing approach can introduce a significant learning curve, particularly for those accustomed to traditional text editors.
  • Complex Configuration
    Configuring Evil to fully integrate with existing Emacs setups can be complex and time-consuming, especially when customizing keybindings and behaviors.
  • Performance
    In some cases, using Evil with certain Emacs configurations or plugins may lead to performance issues, such as lag or delayed responses.
  • Inconsistencies
    There might be inconsistencies between Evilโ€™s implementation of Vim features and the original, which could affect workflows for power users who rely on specific Vim functionalities.

Analysis of Refactor.io

Overall verdict

  • Refactor.io is a highly regarded tool for developers looking to collaborate on code refactoring.

Why this product is good

  • Refactor.io offers a seamless platform for developers to work on improving code structure and readability without changing its functionality. It is praised for its intuitive interface, ease of use, and the ability to facilitate real-time collaboration, making it ideal for pair programming and educational purposes.

Recommended for

  • Software developers looking for real-time collaboration on code projects
  • Teams focusing on improving code quality and maintainability
  • Educational settings where pair programming and code reviews are part of the curriculum

Refactor.io videos

No Refactor.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Evil videos

+ Add

Evil - Season 1 Review [No Spoilers]

More videos:

  • Review - Evil Season 2 Finale Review! (Episode 13)
  • Review - Evil (CBS): Finale/Season 1 - TV Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Refactor.io and Evil)

Refactor.io

Evil

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Refactor.io and Evil. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Evil seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Refactor.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Refactor.io yet. Tracking of Refactor.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Evil mentions (61)

  • Switching from the Mac port Build of Emacs to the Standard NS Build
    That said, the default for sis-context-hooks, which decides when it fires, is '(evil-insert-state-entry-hook), which assumes evil. If you don't use evil, this hook never gets called and it won't work, so you'll need to add hooks that match your own workflow. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Creating an Emacs major mode - because why not?
    For multiple reasons, one of them just being curiosity, I started using Emacs. And before anyone wants to start waging the holy war of editors1, I'll put myself out there and pronounce that the one and only correct answer is: Emacs with EVIL (GitHub) mode. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Helix-gpui: helix gpui front end
    Emacs is whatever you want it to be, and it has wonderful modal editing packages such as evil-mode[1] - which surpasses the editing system from vi that it is based on - and Meow[2] 1. https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Packages that you would like to be in emacs core ?
    Since we already have vyper-mode, why not add Evil to the stack? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Does anyone Lisp without Emacs?
    2 stripe blue belt here! I used to use Vim for everything other than Java development and have now adopted Emacs in the same way. I am using it for Clojure and Common Lisp development along with org mode, irc, rss, git and file management I started with Evil mode and then moved to Xah fly keys before sticking to the emacs bindings. Having the caps lock key bound to CTRL helped me a lot. I don't know if it makes... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Refactor.io and Evil, you can also consider the following products

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Doom Emacs - Emacs configuration similar to Spacemacs but faster and lighter.

PullRequest.com - Code review as a service

Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Vim Adventures - Learning Vim while playing a game

Loading...