Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

CodeStream VS Evil

Compare CodeStream VS Evil and see what are their differences

Woopy
incident management, error monitoring, alerting, on-call, devops, developer tools, webhooks, mobile featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

CodeStream logo CodeStream

CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Evil logo Evil

The extensible vi layer for Emacs.
  • CodeStream Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-15

CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere. Review changes in the context of the full source tree, using your favorite keybindings and environment. Use a simple shortcut to highlight your code and CodeStream will automatically assign a reviewer based on context and history. Comment and code review threads are automatically repositioned as your code changes, even across branches.

  • Evil Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04

CodeStream features and specs

  • Integration with IDEs
    CodeStream integrates seamlessly with popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code, JetBrains, and others, making it easy for developers to use it within their existing workflow.
  • In-Context Collaboration
    Allows developers to comment and discuss code directly within the IDE, fostering better communication without having to leave the development environment.
  • Code Annotations
    Provides the ability to annotate code, making it easier to give feedback, suggest improvements, and highlight important sections.
  • Integration with Issue Trackers
    Supports integration with popular issue trackers like Jira, Trello, and GitHub Issues, enabling seamless issue management.
  • Code Review Support
    Facilitates code reviews directly within the IDE, simplifying the review process and ensuring that feedback is received and addressed promptly.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously.
  • Ease of Use
    User-friendly interface that makes it easy for both new and experienced developers to adopt and use effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CodeStream

  • Performance Overhead
    The additional features and integration can sometimes lead to performance overhead, potentially making the IDE slower.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, some features may still require a learning curve, particularly for developers who are new to in-IDE collaboration tools.
  • Limited to Specific IDEs
    While it integrates with popular IDEs, it does not support all development environments, which may be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services
    Heavily dependent on third-party services like GitHub, Jira, etc., which might cause issues if those services experience downtime or connectivity issues.
  • Subscription Costs
    Depending on the features needed, some functionalities may require a subscription, adding to the overall cost for software development teams.
  • Security Concerns
    Integrating with various external tools and services might raise security concerns, especially for projects with stringent security requirements.

Evil features and specs

  • Vim Emulation
    Evil provides a near-complete emulation of Vimโ€™s features within Emacs, allowing users who are familiar with Vim to transition without losing their preferred keybindings and workflow.
  • Customizability
    Evil allows users to customize their configurations extensively, combining the powerful text-editing capabilities of Vim with the customizability of Emacs.
  • Community Support
    Evil has a large and active community, providing a wealth of plugins and resources to enhance the text editing experience.
  • Mode Integration
    Evil integrates smoothly with various Emacs major and minor modes, allowing users to leverage the full functionality of Emacs alongside Vim's modal editing.

Possible disadvantages of Evil

  • Learning Curve
    For users unfamiliar with Vim, the modal editing approach can introduce a significant learning curve, particularly for those accustomed to traditional text editors.
  • Complex Configuration
    Configuring Evil to fully integrate with existing Emacs setups can be complex and time-consuming, especially when customizing keybindings and behaviors.
  • Performance
    In some cases, using Evil with certain Emacs configurations or plugins may lead to performance issues, such as lag or delayed responses.
  • Inconsistencies
    There might be inconsistencies between Evilโ€™s implementation of Vim features and the original, which could affect workflows for power users who rely on specific Vim functionalities.

Analysis of CodeStream

Overall verdict

  • CodeStream is generally regarded as a beneficial tool for teams looking to enhance their code review processes and internal collaboration. It is well-suited for teams that want to integrate code discussions into their existing workflows seamlessly.

Why this product is good

  • CodeStream is a tool designed to streamline communication and code review processes within development teams. It integrates with popular IDEs and collaboration tools, making it easier for developers to share insights and feedback without leaving their coding environment. This can improve productivity, reduce context-switching, and enhance code quality through more effective reviews and discussions.

Recommended for

    Development teams who heavily rely on IDEs like Visual Studio Code, IntelliJ, and others. It is particularly useful for remote teams that require robust code review and communication tools to maintain effective collaboration.

CodeStream videos

+ Add

CodeStream Code Review Inside Your IDE

More videos:

  • Review - CodeStream
  • Review - CodeStream introduces in-IDE Code Review

Evil videos

+ Add

Evil - Season 1 Review [No Spoilers]

More videos:

  • Review - Evil Season 2 Finale Review! (Episode 13)
  • Review - Evil (CBS): Finale/Season 1 - TV Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to CodeStream and Evil)

CodeStream

Evil

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
Text Editors
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
IDE
0 0%
IDE
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using CodeStream and Evil. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare CodeStream and Evil

CodeStream Reviews

  1. Guest
    Great Product

    After using this with my development team for a few weeks, we grew to love it. Product works amazing for its purpose and really helps developers communicate about our code.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Well designed|Works perfectly

Evil Reviews

We have no reviews of Evil yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Evil seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

CodeStream mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of CodeStream yet. Tracking of CodeStream recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Evil mentions (61)

  • Switching from the Mac port Build of Emacs to the Standard NS Build
    That said, the default for sis-context-hooks, which decides when it fires, is '(evil-insert-state-entry-hook), which assumes evil. If you don't use evil, this hook never gets called and it won't work, so you'll need to add hooks that match your own workflow. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Creating an Emacs major mode - because why not?
    For multiple reasons, one of them just being curiosity, I started using Emacs. And before anyone wants to start waging the holy war of editors1, I'll put myself out there and pronounce that the one and only correct answer is: Emacs with EVIL (GitHub) mode. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Helix-gpui: helix gpui front end
    Emacs is whatever you want it to be, and it has wonderful modal editing packages such as evil-mode[1] - which surpasses the editing system from vi that it is based on - and Meow[2] 1. https://github.com/emacs-evil/evil. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Packages that you would like to be in emacs core ?
    Since we already have vyper-mode, why not add Evil to the stack? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Does anyone Lisp without Emacs?
    2 stripe blue belt here! I used to use Vim for everything other than Java development and have now adopted Emacs in the same way. I am using it for Clojure and Common Lisp development along with org mode, irc, rss, git and file management I started with Evil mode and then moved to Xah fly keys before sticking to the emacs bindings. Having the caps lock key bound to CTRL helped me a lot. I don't know if it makes... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CodeStream and Evil, you can also consider the following products

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Doom Emacs - Emacs configuration similar to Spacemacs but faster and lighter.

Figstack - Your intelligent coding companion

Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring

PullRequest.com - Code review as a service

Vim Adventures - Learning Vim while playing a game

Loading...