Redirect-Check.com VS git-sizer

• Free to Use
  Redirect-Check.com offers its essential URL checking services without charge, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
• Simple Interface
  The website features a user-friendly interface that allows users to quickly input a URL and get results without needing technical expertise.
• Quick Results
  It provides fast results by displaying the redirect chain almost instantly, which is efficient for users needing immediate information.
• Comprehensive Redirect Information
  The tool gives detailed insight into each step of a URL redirect chain, which might be useful for troubleshooting and SEO purposes.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  The site mainly focuses on redirect checking, offering few additional features or integrations that might be available in more comprehensive SEO tools.
• No Support for Bulk URL Checking
  Redirect-Check.com does not offer the ability to check multiple URLs at once, which can be a limitation for users needing to audit larger sets of URLs.
• Basic Design
  The simplistic design might lack advanced functionality that some professional users require for more in-depth analysis.
• Dependence on Internet Connection
  As an online tool, its usage is limited to users who have access to the internet, restricting offline accessibility.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Tracking Redirect-Check.com since Mar 2021.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago