Really Good Emails VS git-sizer

• Extensive Collection
  Really Good Emails features a vast array of email examples from various industries, serving as an excellent resource for inspiration and best practices.
• Categorization
  Emails are well-categorized by type, industry, and elements, making it easy for users to find specific examples relevant to their needs.
• Design Insights
  The site offers insights into email design, layout, and UI/UX strategies, providing valuable learnings for improving one's own email campaigns.
• Search Functionality
  Advanced search capabilities allow users to quickly locate specific email types or elements, enhancing user experience and efficiency.
• Up-to-date Trends
  The platform frequently updates with new email examples, helping users stay up-to-date with current trends and best practices in email marketing.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Free Access
  Some premium features and content are only available through a paid subscription, restricting access for non-paying users.
• Overwhelming Choices
  The extensive collection might be overwhelming for new users who are unsure where to start or what to focus on.
• Subjective Quality
  The perceived 'quality' of a good email can be subjective, and not all examples may align with every user’s specific goals or preferences.
• Less Focus on Strategy
  While design is heavily featured, there is comparatively less content dedicated to the strategic aspects of email campaigns, such as targeting, personalization, and automation.
• Dependence on External Content
  The site relies on external email submissions and examples, which can result in inconsistencies in the regularity and quality of new additions.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Feedback Friday: Really Good Emails #emailgeeksCHI

No git-sizer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• I Was Wrong About Email For Startups. Here’s Everything I Wish I Knew A Year Ago.

  We pulled inspiration from Really Good Emails to make sure our emails actually looked like something people wanted to open — not a system-generated notice. Here’s a good example:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• best platform for creating an affiliate site with a filterable mood board layout?

  Apologies if the title is a bit unclear. I'm in the process of creating an affiliate website that promotes products within a specific niche, utilizing referral links for monetization. I envision a structure akin to a Pinterest board or... Source: almost 3 years ago

• 400+ Websites That I Use as a Web Designer/Freelancer - All Compiled and Categorized in One Place

  Really Good Emails - Another one of the bangers. (One of my Favorites). Source: about 3 years ago

View more

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago