
GitBook
Mintlify
Docusaurus
Archbee.io
Postman
Swagger UI
Document360
A collaborative developer hub for your API or code.

Formspree.io
Basin
Netlify
Formcarry
StaticForms.dev
Paperform
Form backend for static sites. Point your form action at a URL and read submissions in an inbox.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ReadMe seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | readme.com | catchform.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of ReadMe yet.
CatchForm is a form backend for static websites. You change one attribute in your HTML — the form's action — and submissions start landing in an inbox. Each submission is stored, shown in a web inbox, emailed to an address you confirm, and optionally POSTed to a webhook. Field names are yours:...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
ReadMe is recommended for tech companies, API developers, software development teams, product managers, and any organization that needs to create, maintain, and improve the usability of their API documentation. It is particularly beneficial for teams that prioritize collaborative documentation processes and wish to offer users a modern documentation interface.
No analysis of CatchForm.dev yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ReadMe and CatchForm.dev.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
CatchForm is deliberately not a form builder. Your HTML defines the fields — whatever your form posts is what gets stored — so adding a field means editing your own markup, not reconfiguring anything here.
Two defaults are unusual. Notifications only go to an address you have confirmed by clicking a link sent to it, so an endpoint cannot be pointed at a stranger's mailbox. And redirects after submit are restricted to the host you set in your form's settings, so the endpoint cannot be used to bounce visitors to somewhere else.
Submissions are stored independently of email. If a notification bounces or lands in spam, the message is still in your inbox here.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
Because it is not tied to where your site is hosted. The same form works on Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare Pages, GitHub Pages, S3 or your own server, and keeps working when you move between them.
The free plan is meant to be used on a real site rather than to expire: one form, 100 submissions a month, no card. Pro is $12/month or $120/year for 10 forms, 10,000 submissions a month, file uploads and webhooks.
It is built and supported by one developer. Support, billing and bug reports go to one address and are answered by the person who wrote the code — there is no ticket queue to navigate.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
Developers and small web studios building static sites — Astro, Hugo, Eleventy, Jekyll, or hand-written HTML — where there is no server to process a contact form and adding one is out of proportion to the need.
Typically a portfolio, a landing page, documentation, or a small business site with a contact or enquiry form. People who want the form to work, not a form product to learn.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
CatchForm grew out of a set of small tools built by one developer in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. The form backend was the one with demand that never goes away: every static site eventually needs a contact form, and every time it means either standing up a server for a single POST or pasting a mailto: link that quietly loses messages.
It launched publicly on catchform.dev in 2026. It stays deliberately small — one job, done properly, rather than a form builder that grows features until it needs a manual.
Share your experience with using ReadMe and CatchForm.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Readme.com is a developer hub that allows users to publish API documentation. It focuses on making API references interactive by allowing to Try out API calls, log metrics about the API call usage, and more. This...
ReadMe offers integration with apps like Slack, Google Analytics, and Zendesk. One of its most significant advantages is the metrics option which lets you see how customers are using your API.
We have no reviews of CatchForm.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


ReadMe specializes in creating stunning developer experiences. If your API’s success depends on attracting external developers, ReadMe’s polish and developer-centric features deserve consideration. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
In this comparison, we examine four leading platforms: Theneo's AI-first approach with complete developer portals, Redocly's spec-governance excellence, ReadMe's content-centric hubs, and Mintlify's beautiful Git-native design. We'll... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
ReadMe is fantastic for API documentation specifically. The interactive API explorer is genuinely impressive. But if you need more than API docs; tutorials, conceptual guides, getting started content, it starts to feel like you're... - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Tracking CatchForm.dev since Sep 2026.
When comparing ReadMe and CatchForm.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.
Compare GitBook to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev:

Just send your form to our URL and we'll forward it to your email.
Compare Formspree.io to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev:

The AI-powered documentation writer. It's documentation that just appears as you build
Compare Mintlify to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev:

Collect form submissions, filter spam, and automate workflows — with AI landing pages from Basin Sites.
Compare Basin to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev:

Easy to maintain open source documentation websites
Compare Docusaurus to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev:

Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Compare Netlify to ReadMe or CatchForm.dev: