
Vite
React
Next.js
Node.js
Tailwind CSS
Redux.js
Create React App
Quick in-browser prototyping for React Components!

React Native
React Native Desktop
React Native UI Kitten
React Native Paper by Callstack
React Native Elements
Flutter
Shoutem UI toolkit
Experience the awesomeness of React Native without the pain

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, React.run should be more popular than NativeBase. It has been mentioned 194 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | react.dev | nativebase.io |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
It is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
No analysis of NativeBase yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
NativeBase Market Purchase Flow
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using React.run and NativeBase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> The train of thought is “what is everyone using? I’ll use that too” I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Gluestack, like any other customizable UI library, is built to make styling less cumbersome. It comprises a set of themed and unstyled components easily integrated across different platforms and devices. Originally, Gluestack was a part... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Just like the other libraries mentioned in this article, Gluestack is another unstyled component library. Originally a part of NativeBase, the developer team created this library to prevent bloat and enhance maintainability of the project. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
KumaUI : Another relatively new contender, Kuma uses zero runtime CSS-in-JS to create headless UI components which allows a lot of flexibility. It was heavily inspired by other zero runtime CSS-in-JS solutions such as PandaCSS, Vanilla... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
When comparing React.run and NativeBase, you can also consider the following products.


A framework for building native apps with React
Compare React Native to React.run or NativeBase:


Build OS X desktop apps using React Native
Compare React Native Desktop to React.run or NativeBase:

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to React.run or NativeBase:

Customizable and reusable react-native component kit
Compare React Native UI Kitten to React.run or NativeBase: