React.run
Vite
React
Next.js
Node.js
Tailwind CSS
Webpack
Redux.js
Marker.io
BugHerd
Usersnap
Userback
Bird Eats Bug
Pastel
Markup.io
Bugasura
Collect website feedback from your team, clients, and users.
Get feedback with screenshots & technical metadata directly into your favorite project management tool.
Say goodbye to messy emails, spreadsheets and powerpoint. There is a better way!
Marker.ioIt is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
No React.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, React.run seems to be a lot more popular than Marker.io. While we know about 194 links to React.run, we've tracked only 8 mentions of Marker.io. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Itโs already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
> The train of thought is โwhat is everyone using? Iโll use that tooโ I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is something definitely wrong going on. [1] https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1] https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
In times when the official React documentation says:. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Vercel's playbook with Next so far has been to make convoluted features that exist solely to pad out how much people spend on hosting costs. They also make sure that hosting it anywhere but Vercel comes with footguns, even though theoretically you can host your Next app anywhere you want (and it's gotten better recently solely because of backlash). See https://opennext.js.org/ for example. They've been so... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Marker.io is a feedback tool that allows users to attach product comments to a given UI component in an app. Itโs overlaid on the UAT environment, and allows users to export screenshots and logs alongside their review comments. User feedback comments can be automatically converted to tickets. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
This is a really nice note and solution of the problem. What is the difference from your competitor https://marker.io/? - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'm looking for a free and/or open source self-hosted alternative to marker.io for visual bug tracking/reporting. Source: over 3 years ago
Also keep an eye on this discussion to make issue forms available on private repos. Until this is possible, marker.io & Linear are a solution. Source: about 4 years ago
I work for a really small startup ( https://marker.io ) that focuses on drastically improving website feedback workflows for agencies/ clients. In some cases agencies say:. Source: over 4 years ago
Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling
BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
Usersnap - Usersnap is a customer feedback software for SaaS companies that need to constantly improve and grow their products.
Next.js - A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Userback - Userback empowers product teams to collect, understand, and act on user feedback with unprecedented speed and clarity.