warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics.
sponsored
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, React.run
should be more popular than jQuery.
It has been mentioned 194 times since March 2021.
social mentions
194 vs 106
Javascript UI Libraries popularity
34% vs 66%
alternatives listed
108 vs 240+
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Simplified Setup React.run provides a streamlined and efficient setup for starting new React projects, minimizing the initial configuration time.
Pre-configured Environment It comes with a pre-configured environment that includes essential tools and libraries, reducing the need for additional setup and compatibility checks.
Boost developer productivity By automating much of the setup process, React.run allows developers to focus more on coding and less on configuring their development environment.
Consistency Ensures a standardized environment across different projects, which can be particularly beneficial for teams and large-scale applications.
Community Support Being an officially supported tool, it benefits from strong community support and timely updates from the React team.
Possible disadvantages
Limited Flexibility The pre-configured setup may not suit all project requirements, and making customizations can sometimes be challenging or require additional steps.
Learning Curve Developers new to React.run might face a learning curve as they adapt to the specific configurations and conventions used by the tool.
Dependency on Tool Relying heavily on React.run can create dependency, making it harder to switch to different tools or configurations if needed in the future.
Updates and Compatibility Although it receives updates, there's always a risk that a new version might introduce breaking changes or compatibility issues with existing projects.
Potential Overhead The inclusion of tools and libraries that may not be necessary for all projects can potentially add overhead and bloat to the development environment.
Ease of Use jQuery simplifies complex JavaScript tasks by providing easy-to-use methods, which can lead to shorter development times and cleaner code.
Cross-Browser Compatibility jQuery handles many browser inconsistencies, ensuring that your code works seamlessly across different browsers without additional effort.
Large Community and Ecosystem There is a vast community of developers who contribute plugins, extensions, and provide support, making it easier to find solutions and enhance functionality.
Animation and Effects jQuery offers built-in methods for creating animations and effects, allowing developers to enhance the user interface with minimal code.
AJAX Simplification The library provides straightforward methods for making AJAX calls, which simplifies the process of loading data asynchronously.
Documentation and Learning Resources Extensive documentation and a plethora of tutorials are available, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot.
Possible disadvantages
Performance Overhead Using jQuery can add overhead to your application due to its file size and additional abstraction, which can impact performance, especially in resource-constrained environments.
Relevance With the advent of modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, and the improvements in native JavaScript (ES6+), the need for jQuery has decreased, making it less relevant in contemporary web development.
Learning Curve for Advanced Features While basic usage is straightforward, mastering more advanced topics and optimizing performance can be challenging for newcomers.
Potential for Overuse Developers might rely too heavily on jQuery for tasks that can be efficiently handled by native JavaScript, leading to bloated codebases.
Maintenance and Legacy Code Projects heavily reliant on jQuery may face maintenance challenges as modern frameworks and practices evolve, requiring significant refactoring effort if transitioning away from jQuery.
Security Older jQuery versions have known security vulnerabilities, and continuing to use outdated versions can pose security risks. Regular updates are necessary to mitigate this issue.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
React.runjQuery
Overall verdict
Yes, React.run (react.dev) is a valuable resource for understanding and utilizing React effectively.
Why this product is good
React.run, the official website for React's documentation and learning resources, is well-regarded because it provides comprehensive, up-to-date information on React. It is maintained by developers with intimate knowledge of the library. The site features tutorials, guides, and best practices that are essential for both beginners and advanced users.
Recommended for
It is recommended for developers of all levels who are working with or interested in React. Beginners can benefit from the structured tutorials and foundational information, while experienced developers can find advanced topics and the latest developments in the React ecosystem.
Overall verdict
jQuery is good for simplifying and speeding up certain JavaScript tasks, particularly in projects that need to support older browsers or if you are maintaining legacy code. However, for modern web development, many of its features are now part of the JavaScript standard, diminishing its necessity.
Why this product is good
jQuery has been popular due to its simplicity and ease of use, providing an easier way to work with HTML document traversal, event handling, and animations. It abstracts browser differences and offers a concise API for common JavaScript operations.
Recommended for
Developers maintaining or updating legacy projects that already use jQuery.
Projects that require compatibility with older browsers not supported by modern JavaScript features.
Beginners learning JavaScript concepts as an additional tool to practice DOM manipulation and event handling.
jQuery dramatically simplifies JS programming and is easy to learn and use. It is highly extensible and makes web pages load faster. jQuery wraps up a lot of standard functions making the job of the developer easy. A...
The world is full of newer technologies and there are alternatives available for all of them. jQuery is no different. The above-mentioned technologies can be a good alternative to jQuery though jQuery itself has a...
jQuery has been in the development scene for a long time and has been the unprecedented king for webpage dev. It is one of the most common libraries used throughout the world, with more than 50% of websites using...
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
It’s already been captured. Check out the docs for creating a new React app on react.dev: https://react.dev/learn/creating-a-react-app It throws you straight at Next.js.
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago
> The train of thought is “what is everyone using? I’ll use that too” I'm not so sure about that. We're seeing Next.js being pushed as the successor of create-react-app even in react.dev[1], which as a premise is kind of stupid. There is...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago
The React documentation is infamously responsible of recommending Next as a "default". After a lot of backlash it got somewhat toned down, but it's still the first thing they suggest[1] for creating a new app [1]...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago
John Resig created jQuery at BarCamp NYC in January 2006. Its key sources of inspiration included Dean Edwards' CSSQuery library and other community projects from that time.
- Source: dev.to
/
4 months ago
