React-Ionic VS WhoGoes

WhoGoes's answer:

Every contact comes with a clickable LinkedIn post showing the person publicly said they're attending the event. Open the post. Confirm the record. That single proof layer doesn't exist on any other attendee data platform. Bombora and 6sense give you anonymous account-level intent signals, list resellers sell historical data with no source attribution, and badge scraping at the booth gives you data weeks after the show floor has already closed. WhoGoes gives you named individuals with verified work emails sourced from posts published about upcoming events, available before the show opens. Free to browse. No login needed.

WhoGoes's answer:

Three reasons. Lower price, real proof, faster timing.

On price: $29 for 200 contacts versus Bombora at $25,000 per year and 6sense at $50,000 per year. No contracts. No minimums.

On proof: every record links to the public LinkedIn post where the contact said they're attending, so any rep on your team can verify a contact in under 10 seconds before sending a single email. PullAList and VisitorsList don't offer that sourcing transparency.

On timing: data is sourced from posts about upcoming events instead of historical lists from prior years, which means SDRs and field marketers can build pre-event outreach lists weeks before the show opens rather than getting badge-scrape data after the floor closes.

WhoGoes's answer:

B2B sales and marketing teams who need to reach trade show attendees before the show happens. That's the core ICP. Pretty narrow.

SDRs and BDRs at SaaS and services companies run pre-event outreach campaigns to reach attendees before the booth goes up, opening with real context pulled from the prospect's own LinkedIn post instead of a cold pitch. Field marketers and event marketers book meetings and dinners before the show floor opens. Exhibitors and sponsors check whether target accounts are actually attending before committing $15,000 to a booth.

Smaller teams without intent data budgets get the most value, since $29 unlocks the same kind of named-contact data that Bombora and 6sense gate behind $25,000 to $50,000 annual contracts.

WhoGoes's answer:

Sales reps had been manually digging through LinkedIn before every trade show, copy-pasting names from posts about CES, HIMSS, and Dreamforce into spreadsheets, then hunting down work emails one by one. Hours per event. Most quit halfway.

The fix was obvious. If the data is sitting in public posts, automate the extraction, verify the emails, link every record back to the source post for proof, and price it so a single SDR can buy it without a procurement cycle.

WhoGoes launched in 2023 from San Francisco, US. The bet was that pay-as-you-go pricing plus public source attribution would beat the $25,000-a-year platforms for teams who don't need anonymous account intent and would rather have named individuals with verifiable proof.

WhoGoes's answer:

WhoGoes runs on a modern TypeScript stack. Serverless throughout. No legacy code.

• Frontend: Next.js 16 (App Router), React 19, TypeScript, TailwindCSS v4
• Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Auth, Row-Level Security)
• Hosting: Vercel
• Email validation: ZeroBounce
• Payments: Razorpay
• Email automation: Loops.so
• Data enrichment: Multiple email providers
• Content/SEO: MDX blog, JSON-LD structured data, IndexNow

The whole stack is serverless and pay-as-you-grow, which keeps unit economics tight enough to offer $29 starter credits without bleeding margin and lets the product ship new features without a DevOps team or an SRE pager rotation.