
Redux.js
React
Next.js
Recoiljs
React Redux
MobX
styled-components
Context provides a way to pass data through the component tree without having to pass props down manually at every level.

bundlejs
date-fns
Vite
esbuild
Prettier
BeaverCheck
NPMScan
Find the performance impact of adding a npm package to your bundle.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, react-context should be more popular than BundlePhobia. It has been mentioned 209 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | legacy.reactjs.org | bundlephobia.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
React Context is recommended for small to medium-sized applications or for managing specific sections of the application's state that are shared across many components. It is well-suited for developers looking for a lightweight approach to state management without introducing external dependencies.
No analysis of BundlePhobia yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using react-context and BundlePhobia. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


React's hooks (useState, useEffect, useContext) allow for easy encapsulation of reactive business logic. The Context API reduces prop drilling by making state accessible at any component level. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Use context wherever possible: For application-wide state that needs to be accessed by many components, use the Context API to avoid prop drilling. Here’s where to learn more about the context API. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The context API is generally used for managing states that will be needed across an application. For example, we need our user data or tokens that are returned as part of the login response in the dashboard components. Also, some parts... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
The package and bundle figures below are based on the ChromaPanel comparison audit and the current package documentation. Bundle figures refer to the package main entry measured by Bundlephobia, which is different from the amount that a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Check packages on Bundlephobia before importing. A date-picker that pulls in 80 KB gzipped when you need one function is a problem you choose. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Before adding any npm package, check bundlephobia.com for the bundle cost. Example: lodash costs 70KB — lodash-es with tree shaking costs 0-70KB depending on what you import. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
When comparing react-context and BundlePhobia, you can also consider the following products.

Predictable state container for JavaScript apps
Compare Redux.js to react-context or BundlePhobia:

A quick and easy way to bundle, minify, and compress (gzip and brotli) your ts, js, jsx and npm projects all online, with the bundle file size.
Compare bundlejs to react-context or BundlePhobia:

A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
Compare React to react-context or BundlePhobia:

date-fns provides the most comprehensive yet simple and consistent toolset for manipulating JavaScript dates in a browser & Node.js.
Compare date-fns to react-context or BundlePhobia:

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps
Compare Next.js to react-context or BundlePhobia:
