Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RAWGraphs VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare RAWGraphs VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

RAWGraphs logo RAWGraphs

RAWGraphs is an open source app built with the goal of making the visualization of complex data...

CrossBrowserTesting logo CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.
  • RAWGraphs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-16
  • CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

RAWGraphs features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    RAWGraphs provides an intuitive drag and drop interface, making it accessible for users with various technical skills.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, RAWGraphs allows for customization and community contributions, promoting transparency and flexibility.
  • Supports Multiple Data Formats
    RAWGraphs supports a variety of input formats like CSV, TSV, JSON, etc., enhancing its adaptability to different data sources.
  • Extensive Visualization Types
    Offers a wide range of visualization types such as bar graphs, scatter plots, and network graphs, catering to diverse analytical needs.
  • No Installation Required
    As a web-based tool, it does not require any installation, making it easy to access and use anywhere with an internet connection.
  • Export Options
    Allows exporting visualizations in vector (SVG) and raster (PNG) formats, which is valuable for high-quality reporting and presentations.

Possible disadvantages of RAWGraphs

  • Limited Interactivity
    Visualizations created with RAWGraphs are generally static, lacking advanced interactive features found in other tools.
  • Performance with Large Datasets
    May struggle with performance issues when handling very large datasets, which can limit its use for extensive data analytics.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are user-friendly, leveraging advanced features and customizations may require a steeper learning curve.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a web-based application, it requires an internet connection to function, which can be a limitation in restricted or offline environments.
  • Limited Data Manipulation
    Provides basic data manipulation features, but lacks the depth and complexity available in specialized data processing tools.
  • Support and Documentation
    As an open-source project, it may not have the extensive support and documentation available with commercial visualization tools.

CrossBrowserTesting features and specs

  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages of CrossBrowserTesting

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis of RAWGraphs

Overall verdict

  • Yes, RAWGraphs is a good tool for creating data visualizations due to its ease of use, versatility, and robust support for different data types and outputs.

Why this product is good

  • RAWGraphs is considered a good data visualization tool because it is open-source, versatile, and easy to use. It allows users to create a wide variety of charts and visualizations without needing extensive coding knowledge. Its interface is intuitive and facilitates the quick transformation of data sets into visually compelling graphics. Furthermore, it supports multiple formats for data input and export, making it flexible for various project needs.

Recommended for

  • data analysts
  • journalists
  • researchers
  • educators
  • students
  • designers who need to create visualizations without in-depth coding skills.

Analysis of CrossBrowserTesting

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

RAWGraphs videos

RawGraphs Walkthrough

CrossBrowserTesting videos

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison โ€“ LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RAWGraphs and CrossBrowserTesting)
Data Visualization
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Charting Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using RAWGraphs and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RAWGraphs and CrossBrowserTesting

RAWGraphs Reviews

Top 10 Tableau Open Source Alternatives: A Comprehensive List
RAWGraphs is an open-source Data Visualization tool designed to make visualizing complex data simple for everyone. The primary goal of RAWGraphs is to provide a tool that allows people who do not have the technical/coding expertise to create visualizations on their own. Originally designed to help graphic designers complete a set of tasks that were not available in other...
Source: hevodata.com

CrossBrowserTesting Reviews

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

CrossBrowserTesting might be a bit more popular than RAWGraphs. We know about 6 links to it since March 2021 and only 5 links to RAWGraphs. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RAWGraphs mentions (5)

  • Interview synthesis tools?
    Go back through a second time Code themes / pull insights/ double check for keywords tag accuracy Use Dovetailโ€™s โ€œchartsโ€ to review various tags (it will show you how many tags per word in various chart options, none are great.) Export desired csvโ€™s from Dovetail Charts to free online data viz software like https://rawgraphs.io Boom. Iโ€™m sure there are better ways but thatโ€™s what I got! Source: over 4 years ago
  • What type/style of chart is this?
    Sankey is probably the most common name (after Captain Matthew Henry Phineas Riall Sankey who apparently made them to study energy flows in steam engines). But I've also heard it referred to as an alluvial diagram, for example in https://rawgraphs.io/. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: I made a data visualization desktop app
    This seems quite similar to RawGraphs: https://rawgraphs.io/ Both seem to provide a similar interface for dragging in a CSV file and constructing a chart, but RawGraphs is open-source, and can be used in the browser without installing anything (or the code can be downloaded and served locally). The main advantage of Daigo over RawGraphs seems to be that it supports publishing multiple charts as a dashboard.... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • [OC] Latin Americaโ€™s biggest airports had been growing steadily. With Covid, it all changed.
    Tools: Excel, Rawgraphs, Affinity Designer. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Self-hosted solution for easy data visualization?
    Take a look at https://rawgraphs.io/. Source: about 5 years ago

CrossBrowserTesting mentions (6)

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a lot Https://www.howacarworks.com/ - how a car works Https://www.mcmaster.com/ - the UI here is so nice. Those illustrations Https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/ - how does a mechanical... - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we donโ€™t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has built-in support for all major browsers, including Firefox, Edge, and Safari, all thanks to its integration with the W3C Webdriver API and Selenium. It also allows you to use... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    Crossbrowsertesting.com - Manual, Visual, and Selenium Browser Testing in the cloud - free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
  • How do yโ€™all test responsiveness of website?
    Professionally, I do basically the same for dev testing. We also have various devices on different platforms/versions in the office when needed, and our QA team primarily uses Cross Browser Testing Tool. If I need to check something specific, I usually use CBT. Source: about 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RAWGraphs and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products

Plotly - Low-Code Data Apps

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

Tableau - Tableau can help anyone see and understand their data. Connect to almost any database, drag and drop to create visualizations, and share with a click.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.