Software Alternatives & Startups

Qodex VS Splitaha

Compare Qodex VS Splitaha and see what are their differences

Qodex

A swarm of AI agents attacks and tests your app 24/7 so your team does not have to

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $1,299 / Monthly (Startup, per project)
Splitaha

Splitaha allows users to easily manage shared expenses between friends, families, and individuals

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

AI popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
10 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Qodex
Splitaha
Website qodex.ai splitaha.com
Pricing
Freemium $1,299 / Monthly (Startup, per project) Official pricing
Platforms
Web Docker AWS
—
Company Startup from the United States · 20 - 49 employees —
Listed in

About Qodex and Splitaha

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Qodex
Splitaha

Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team. The problem: your team ships with coding agents, so the code doubles and the people who test and secure it do not. 45% of AI-written code fails OWASP Top 10...

Read more about Qodex

No description of Splitaha yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Qodex 8 features
Splitaha 3 features
  • Security attacks from chat: OWASP Top 10 and OWASP API Top 10, with the exploit reproduced as evidence
    OWASP Top 10 and OWASP API Top 10
  • UI tests in a real browser, with steps that re-find their control when the screen changes
    Real browser
  • API tests from an OpenAPI, Swagger or Postman import
    OpenAPI, Swagger or Postman import
  • Saved tests re-run every night and on every deploy with no AI calls
    No AI calls
  • Every failure labelled real bug, stale test or environment problem
    Real bug, stale test or environment problem
  • Tests exported as standard Playwright and HTTP code you own
    Playwright and HTTP code
  • Runs from CI, webhooks, Claude Code and Cursor (MCP)
    CI, webhooks, Claude Code and Cursor
  • Production errors turned into tests from Sentry, Datadog, Bugsnag, Rollbar and PagerDuty
    Sentry, Datadog, Bugsnag, Rollbar and PagerDuty
  • Likely focused on expense splitting
    Based on the name, Splitaha appears to be a bill or expense-splitting tool. I could not access or verify the site, so confirm this on splitaha.com. If it is, a tool built for one purpose is usually simpler than a general finance app.
  • Potential convenience for group costs
    Expense-splitting apps generally replace manual spreadsheets and chat arithmetic for trips, roommates and shared meals. Check whether Splitaha offers features such as automatic balance calculation or simplified debts.
  • Possible low barrier to entry
    Many apps in this category have free tiers or need no complicated setup. I have not verified Splitaha's pricing or onboarding, so check them directly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Unverified information
    I could not browse the site or find reliable details about Splitaha, so any feature claims here are assumptions. Check the site itself before relying on them.
  • Limited track record or reviews
    I found no established user reviews, so I cannot confirm its reliability, popularity or support quality. Look for independent reviews and app store ratings.
  • Unknown data privacy and security
    Apps that handle shared financial details should state clearly how they store and protect data. Review Splitaha's privacy policy and security practices before entering sensitive information.
  • Unknown payment and integration support
    It is unclear whether Splitaha supports settling up through payment services, multiple currencies or exports. Established competitors such as Splitwise offer some of these, so compare features before committing.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Qodex
Splitaha

Overall verdict

  • Qodex.ai is a solid choice for teams seeking to automate software testing using AI, offering good value through reduced manual QA effort and faster release cycles, though it's best suited for teams already invested in modern CI/CD workflows.

Why this product is good

  • Leverages AI to automatically generate and maintain test cases, reducing manual test-writing effort
  • Integrates with common CI/CD pipelines to enable continuous testing
  • Helps identify bugs and edge cases that manual testing might miss
  • Reduces time-to-release by speeding up QA cycles
  • Scales testing efforts without proportionally scaling QA headcount
  • Offers self-healing test scripts that adapt to UI/code changes, lowering maintenance overhead

Recommended for

  • Software development teams practicing CI/CD who want to automate regression testing
  • QA teams looking to reduce manual testing workload with AI-assisted tools
  • Startups and SMBs wanting to scale testing without hiring large QA teams
  • Product teams aiming for faster release cycles with reliable test coverage
  • Organizations dealing with frequent UI changes needing resilient, self-healing test scripts

No analysis of Splitaha yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Qodex
Splitaha
100% 100%
AI
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Qodex and Splitaha.

What's the story behind your product?

Qodex's answer

We built Qodex because AI made writing code cheap and left testing and security where they were. Describe what to attack or test, watch a swarm of agents try to break your running app, and keep every test it writes as plain Playwright or HTTP code. Free plan, no card. Tell us what it breaks.

What makes your product unique?

Qodex's answer

Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Qodex's answer

Atomicwork runs Qodex security and QA on the code Devin writes: weeks on security tests, now within hours. Matchbook moved all of its security testing and QA onto Qodex: release QA from 12 people over 5 days to 2 people in half a day, a QA team 80% smaller. Mavim tested a complex API change in two days instead of two weeks. Factors.ai went from weeks to half a day for release coverage, with 100+ checks on every release. Chargebee runs its security tests on Qodex in a pilot.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Qodex's answer

CTOs and engineering leads at 50 to 500 person software companies that ship with coding agents and have no security team and a shrinking QA team.

User comments

Share your experience with using Qodex and Splitaha. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Qodex and Splitaha

When comparing Qodex and Splitaha, you can also consider the following products.