Qodex
A swarm of AI agents attacks and tests your app 24/7 so your team does not have to.
A startup from San Francisco, the United States, founded by Siddhant Mohan.
A swarm of AI agents attacks and tests your app 24/7 so your team does not have to.
A startup from San Francisco, the United States, founded by Siddhant Mohan.
This page is designed to help you find out whether Qodex is good and if it is the right choice for you.
Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team.
The problem: your team ships with coding agents, so the code doubles and the people who test and secure it do not. 45% of AI-written code fails OWASP Top 10 security tests (Veracode, 2025). Your pentest is once a year.
What Qodex does: a swarm of agents runs against your live app. The largest group tries to break in the way a hacker would: injection, broken auth, one customer seeing another customer's data, the OWASP Top 10 and the OWASP API Top 10, with the exploit reproduced as evidence. The others click through every screen in a real browser and call every API, from an OpenAPI, Swagger or Postman import.
How you drive it: describe what to attack or test in plain English and watch it work live. It remembers your app across sessions: auth, quirks, past bugs, your code if you link the repo.
What you keep: every test is saved as plain Playwright or HTTP code you own. Saved tests re-run with no AI calls, every night, from CI on every deploy, or from Claude Code and Cursor. When a screen changes, a saved step finds its control again from the intent.
What you get back: every failure labelled real bug, stale test or environment problem, with severity, steps and evidence. A security test passes only when the attack was blocked.
Start: free plan, no card. Paid from $1,299 per project per month. Managed cloud, AWS Marketplace or self-host.
Atomicwork runs Qodex security and QA on the code Devin writes: weeks on security tests, now within hours. Matchbook moved all of its security testing and QA onto Qodex: release QA from 12 people over 5 days to 2 people in half a day, a QA team 80% smaller. Mavim tested a complex API change in two days instead of two weeks. Factors.ai went from weeks to half a day for release coverage, with 100+ checks on every release. Chargebee runs its security tests on Qodex in a pilot.
Listed in
Security attacks from chat: OWASP Top 10 and OWASP API Top 10, with the exploit reproduced as evidence
OWASP Top 10 and OWASP API Top 10
UI tests in a real browser, with steps that re-find their control when the screen changes
Real browser
API tests from an OpenAPI, Swagger or Postman import
OpenAPI, Swagger or Postman import
Saved tests re-run every night and on every deploy with no AI calls
No AI calls
Every failure labelled real bug, stale test or environment problem
Real bug, stale test or environment problem
Tests exported as standard Playwright and HTTP code you own
Playwright and HTTP code
Runs from CI, webhooks, Claude Code and Cursor (MCP)
CI, webhooks, Claude Code and Cursor
Production errors turned into tests from Sentry, Datadog, Bugsnag, Rollbar and PagerDuty
Sentry, Datadog, Bugsnag, Rollbar and PagerDuty
We built Qodex because AI made writing code cheap and left testing and security where they were. Describe what to attack or test, watch a swarm of agents try to break your running app, and keep every test it writes as plain Playwright or HTTP code. Free plan, no card. Tell us what it breaks.
Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team.
Atomicwork runs Qodex security and QA on the code Devin writes: weeks on security tests, now within hours. Matchbook moved all of its security testing and QA onto Qodex: release QA from 12 people over 5 days to 2 people in half a day, a QA team 80% smaller. Mavim tested a complex API change in two days instead of two weeks. Factors.ai went from weeks to half a day for release coverage, with 100+ checks on every release. Chargebee runs its security tests on Qodex in a pilot.
CTOs and engineering leads at 50 to 500 person software companies that ship with coding agents and have no security team and a shrinking QA team.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Qodex is good.
Check the traffic stats of Qodex on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Qodex on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Qodex's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Qodex on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Qodex on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing Qodex to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Qodex good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Qodex here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
