
mabl
LamaQA
Burp Suite
testRigor
Escape.tech
Postman
Keploy
A swarm of AI agents attacks and tests your app 24/7 so your team does not have to

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | qodex.ai | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States · 20 - 49 employees | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team. The problem: your team ships with coding agents, so the code doubles and the people who test and secure it do not. 45% of AI-written code fails OWASP Top 10...
No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Qodex and ShellNewHandler.
Qodex's answer
We built Qodex because AI made writing code cheap and left testing and security where they were. Describe what to attack or test, watch a swarm of agents try to break your running app, and keep every test it writes as plain Playwright or HTTP code. Free plan, no card. Tell us what it breaks.
Qodex's answer
Qodex is a swarm of AI agents that attacks and tests your app 24/7, so your team ships AI-written code without a security or QA team.
Qodex's answer
Atomicwork runs Qodex security and QA on the code Devin writes: weeks on security tests, now within hours. Matchbook moved all of its security testing and QA onto Qodex: release QA from 12 people over 5 days to 2 people in half a day, a QA team 80% smaller. Mavim tested a complex API change in two days instead of two weeks. Factors.ai went from weeks to half a day for release coverage, with 100+ checks on every release. Chargebee runs its security tests on Qodex in a pilot.
Qodex's answer
CTOs and engineering leads at 50 to 500 person software companies that ship with coding agents and have no security team and a shrinking QA team.
Share your experience with using Qodex and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Qodex since Jan 2025.
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
When comparing Qodex and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.


Lama is an AI QA agent that navigates your app, learns how it works, and tests it - all from a simple conversation.
Compare LamaQA to Qodex or ShellNewHandler:

Burp Suite is an integrated platform for performing security testing of web applications.
Compare Burp Suite to Qodex or ShellNewHandler:

Use plain English to build stable and maintainable functional end-to-end tests.
Compare testRigor to Qodex or ShellNewHandler:

Escape helps teams secure modern applications - APIs, Single Page Apps, and Microservices by finding business logic flaws at scale with proprietary algorithm and empowering developers to fix them efficiently.
Compare Escape.tech to Qodex or ShellNewHandler:
