
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, qimgv seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 7 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | shadowgit.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of qimgv yet.
Every change saved. Any version restorable. AI can search what changed to debug faster. Never lose work again. Cut debugging time by 80%. Save 50% on AI tokens. 100% local.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No qimgv videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
ShadowGit AI Integration
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing qimgv and ShadowGit.
ShadowGit's answer:
ShadowGit is the only tool where AI assistants can directly search your code history to debug faster while using 50% fewer tokens. Auto-captures every change without touching your main git repo. Built specifically for AI-assisted development.
ShadowGit's answer:
Electron is the primary technology being used.
ShadowGit's answer:
ShadowGit is the only tool built specifically for developers using AI. Unlike generic backup tools, your AI can actually search the history to debug faster and use 50% fewer tokens. Separate shadow repo means your main git stays clean. 100% local.
ShadowGit's answer:
AI-Accelerated solo developers that use AI coding assistants daily (Claude, Cursor, Copilot), experienced enough to feel the pain (2-10 years of coding) and that want to move fast, ship often and experiment constantly.
ShadowGit's answer:
I built ShadowGit after losing 3 hours of work to a bad AI refactor. Started as a personal backup tool, but when I added MCP integration so AI could search the history, debugging time dropped 80%. Had to share it.
Share your experience with using qimgv and ShadowGit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


About this time, I am a little more than intrigued and a bit confused. I use my image viewing program qimgv (github) by typing qimvg 87956_60.png and was shown a photograph of a man seemingly turning his head to look at me. Source: over 3 years ago
Qimgv - Image viewer. Fast, easy to use. Optional video support. Very powerful, qt app, best for me. Source: over 3 years ago
I use qimgv, It's mostly frameless (It only has a window bar), supports going left and right through images, even sorted by date and even on a directory with 80k+ files in it. It also has some very useful features in the right-click menu... Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking ShadowGit since Sep 2025.
When comparing qimgv and ShadowGit, you can also consider the following products.

XnView is a free software that allows you to view, resize and edit your images. It supports more than 500 different formats!
Compare XnView MP to qimgv or ShadowGit:

Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Compare Git to qimgv or ShadowGit:

FastStone Image Viewer is a fast, stable, user-friendly image browser, converter and editor.
Compare FastStone Image Viewer to qimgv or ShadowGit:

nomacs is a free, open source image viewer, which supports mu
Compare nomacs to qimgv or ShadowGit:

IrfanView ... one of the most popular viewers worldwide.
Compare IrfanView to qimgv or ShadowGit:

You can use Image to view your digital images and photos of many different formats.
Compare ImageGlass to qimgv or ShadowGit: