Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

QB64 VS Rows

Compare QB64 VS Rows and see what are their differences

QB64

Development

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Rows

The spreadsheet where teams work faster

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Notivo
Notivo is a private, per-person notebook for managers. Capture feedback, commitments, and 1:1 context as it happens — from web, iOS, WhatsApp, email, ChatGPT, or Claude — then get it back later, organized by person. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Rows seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 24
IDE popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
33 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

QB64
Rows
Website qb64.org rows.com
Pricing
Open source
Official pricing
Company — Startup from Germany · 10 - 19 employees · 2016
Listed in
IDE Game Engine Text Editors Education +1
Spreadsheets Spreadsheets As A Backend No Code Productivity Web App Project Management +3

About QB64 and Rows

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

QB64
Rows

No description of QB64 yet.

Slick design. Built-in integrations. Revolutionary sharing. Rows reinvented spreadsheets so teams do more, crazy fast.

Read more about Rows

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

QB64 5 features
Rows 5 features
  • Compatibility
    QB64 maintains compatibility with QBasic and QuickBASIC code, allowing users to run legacy programs without modification.
  • Cross-Platform
    QB64 is available on major operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility to developers.
  • Modern Enhancements
    Incorporates modern features such as improved graphics, sound support, and networking capabilities beyond what was possible in the original QBasic.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, QB64 encourages community involvement, transparency, and contributions to the codebase.
  • Ease of Use
    Retains a simple, user-friendly interface that is accessible to beginners while providing powerful features for advanced users.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance
    While optimized for modern systems, QB64 can be slower than more contemporary programming languages, particularly for complex applications.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    QB64 lacks the extensive library support and community resources available to more popular languages like Python or Java.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Users familiar with original QBasic may find it challenging to adapt to the newer, advanced features without proper documentation.
  • Niche Use Case
    Its primary appeal is for legacy support and nostalgia, which limits its application in modern, large-scale software development.
  • Legacy Language Constraints
    QB64 inherits some limitations of BASIC, such as less structured programming paradigms, which can impact code clarity and maintainability.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Rows provides an intuitive and easy-to-use spreadsheet interface that is accessible for users of all skill levels, from beginners to advanced.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Supports a variety of integrations with other software services and APIs, allowing for seamless data import and export.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    Allows multiple users to work on the same spreadsheet simultaneously, enhancing team productivity and ensuring everyone has the latest information.
  • Customization and Automation
    Offers powerful automation features and the ability to write custom scripts, which can save time and reduce manual errors.
  • Template Library
    Provides a rich library of pre-designed templates that can help users quickly get started on common business tasks.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    While user-friendly, more advanced features and scripting capabilities may require a significant learning curve for new users.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Primarily a cloud-based tool, which means it relies heavily on internet connection and offers limited offline functionality.
  • Pricing
    The cost of premium features or larger scale deployments can be high, which may not be affordable for small businesses or individual users.
  • Dependency on Integrations
    Heavily reliant on third-party integrations, which means any issues or changes in connected services can impact Rows' functionality.
  • Security Concerns
    As with any cloud-based service, there may be concerns about data security and privacy, especially for sensitive or confidential information.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

QB64
Rows

No analysis of QB64 yet.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Rows is considered a good tool, especially for those who need a blend of traditional spreadsheet capabilities enhanced with modern, cloud-based functionalities. Its powerful integration options and user-friendly interface make it a compelling choice for data-driven organizations.

Why this product is good

  • Rows (rows.com) is a spreadsheet tool that stands out due to its modern approach to data management and collaboration. It combines the familiarity of spreadsheet functionalities with powerful integrations and automation features. Users appreciate its ability to pull in data from various API services without requiring advanced technical skills, making it easier for teams to manage and analyze data collaboratively. The interface is intuitive and designed for seamless teamwork, enabling real-time updates and sharing capabilities.

Recommended for

  • Data analysts seeking a more intuitive way to integrate and analyze data.
  • Small businesses looking to streamline reporting and data-driven decision-making processes.
  • Teams that require collaborative and real-time updates on shared projects.
  • Individuals who are familiar with spreadsheet interfaces but lack advanced programming skills and need easy API integrations.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

QB64 3 videos + Add
Rows 3 videos + Add

✅ Trying out QB64 v1.5 with my little platform game - Day 7

More videos

  • - QB64 Report - S01E02 - SCREEN modes
  • - Old man Nick tries coding QB/QB64?

Welcome to Rows

More videos

  • - The Truth about Barbell Rows (AVOID MISTAKES!)
  • - 9/21/21 bentover rows review

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
QB64
Rows
100% 100%
IDE
0% 0%
0% 0%
Spreadsheets
100% 100%
100% 100%
Text Editors
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using QB64 and Rows. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

QB64 no reviews yet
Rows no reviews yet

We have no reviews of QB64 yet. Be the first one to post

  • The best no-code tools for sales teams
    www.nocode.tech · Jul 2023

    You can bring your data to life. With Rows, you can jazz up your spreadsheets with slick charts, images, audio and even interactive features such as buttons and checkboxes. What’s more, you can share your spreadsheets...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

QB64 0 mentions
Rows 24 mentions

Tracking QB64 since May 2021.

View more

Alternatives to QB64 and Rows

When comparing QB64 and Rows, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...