Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

pytest VS Cucumber

Compare pytest VS Cucumber and see what are their differences

ESET PROTECT Advanced
Best-in-class endpoint protection against ransomware & zero-day threats, backed by powerful data security featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

pytest logo pytest

Javascript Testing Framework

Cucumber logo Cucumber

Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
  • pytest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • Cucumber Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-19

pytest features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Pytest is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal boilerplate code required to write tests. Its straightforward syntax allows users to quickly write and understand tests.
  • Extensive Plugin System
    Pytest has a flexible and powerful plugin architecture, with a wide range of community-maintained plugins available, allowing for easy customization and extension of its functionality.
  • Detailed Information on Failures
    Pytest provides detailed and informative feedback on failures, enhancing the debugging process by highlighting where and why a test failed.
  • Fixture Support
    Pytest's fixture system allows for easy setup and teardown of test environments, encouraging the reuse of setup code and reducing code duplication.
  • Compatibility
    Pytest is compatible with standard Python testing frameworks such as unittest, allowing for easy migration and integration of existing tests.

Possible disadvantages of pytest

  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, mastering advanced pytest features, such as writing custom plugins and fixtures, can have a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large projects, the additional features and flexibility of pytest can introduce some performance overhead when running tests, compared to simpler testing frameworks.
  • Complexity in Parameterized Testing
    While pytest supports parameterized testing, setting up and managing complex parameterizations can become cumbersome and might require additional abstraction layers.
  • Plugin Conflicts
    With a vast ecosystem of plugins, there is a potential for conflicts or compatibility issues between different plugins, especially when they modify similar pytest behaviors.

Cucumber features and specs

  • Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Framework
    Cucumber supports BDD, allowing collaboration between developers, testers, and non-technical stakeholders to improve the quality of development through clear specifications.
  • Gherkin Syntax
    Utilizes the Gherkin language to write test cases in plain English, making them more readable and understandable for non-technical team members.
  • Integrates with Other Tools
    Easily integrates with other testing and development frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Selenium, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, Cucumber allows for extensive customization and community support, reducing the cost of setting up a testing framework.
  • Supports Multiple Languages
    Offers support for various programming languages including Java, Ruby, and JavaScript, making it versatile for different project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Cucumber

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Requires a good understanding of both BDD practices and Cucumber’s structure, which might be challenging for beginners.
  • Performance Overheads
    Execution of Cucumber tests can be slower compared to other testing frameworks, making it less ideal for very large projects requiring fast feedback loops.
  • Verbose Code
    Writing tests in Gherkin can lead to more verbose code, which might require additional maintenance and can become cumbersome over time.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies for integrating Cucumber with other testing frameworks can be complex, requiring careful coordination.
  • Not Ideal for Unit Testing
    Cucumber is more suited for acceptance and integration testing rather than unit testing, potentially necessitating additional tools for a comprehensive testing strategy.

pytest videos

+ Add

getting started with pytest (beginner - intermediate) anthony explains #518

More videos:

  • Review - Python Code Review: Adding Pytest Tests to an Existing Python Web Scraper
  • Review - pytest: everything you need to know about fixtures (intermediate) anthony explains #487

Cucumber videos

+ Add

Madam Kilay Skin Magical Review / Orange cucumber review

More videos:

  • Review - Puff Bar - Cucumber Review (Best Disposable Vape Brand)
  • Review - THE CUCUMBER CHALLENGE! (1 MILLION SUBSCRIBER SPECIAL)
  • Tutorial - Cucumber automation suit

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pytest and Cucumber)

pytest

Cucumber

Automated Testing
12 12%
Automated Testing
88% 88
Testing
20 20%
Testing
80% 80
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100
Online Services
100 100%
Online Services
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using pytest and Cucumber. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare pytest and Cucumber

pytest Reviews

25 Python Frameworks to Master
Pytest is a widely adopted testing framework that is designed to be easy to use and extend. It helps you to write elegant tests in both small and complex Python codebases.
Source: kinsta.com

Cucumber Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Cucumber itself is not a test automation tool but a framework that supports BDD. It is often used in conjunction with Selenium to provide a layer where test scenarios are written in a way that is understandable by all team members. Unlike Selenium, which focuses on automating browser actions, Cucumber focuses on defining behavior and can be used to drive Selenium tests.
Source: bugbug.io
5 Selenium Alternatives to Fill in Your Top Testing Gaps
Business testers are likely to prefer to use Cucumber over Selenium since script Cucumber lets you write test scenarios using a plain-English scripting language called Gherkin. Using Gherkin instead of code makes test script creation a much simpler process, since anyone can read, write, and understand the scripts regardless of testing experience.
Source: www.perfecto.io
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Cucumber is an open-source tool that is designed over the concept of BDD (Behavior-driven development). It is used to perform the automated acceptance testing by running the examples that best describe the behavior of the application. It gets you a single up-to-date living document that is having both specification and test documentation.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pytest should be more popular than Cucumber. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pytest mentions (5)

  • An Introduction to Testing with Django for Python
    Pytest is an excellent alternative to unittest. Even though it doesn't come built-in to Python itself, it is considered more pythonic than unittest. It doesn't require a TestClass, has less boilerplate code, and has a plain assert statement. Pytest has a rich plugin ecosystem, including a specific Django plugin, pytest-django. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • How I Added Continuous Integration (CI) to a C++ Project
    For this lab exercise I had the opportunity to add unit tests to a classmate's project and experience their CI workflow. For this exercise I worked on go-go-web by kliu57. Go-Go Web is written in Python and uses the pytest testing framework. This was my first time writing tests for pytest, but I found the pytest docs helpful. However, more helpful was the information provided in the associated issue and the tests... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • CI/CD Part 1: Unit/Integration Testing
    This week, in a setup for a CI/CD pipeline, I added unit and integration testing using Pytest to my Python CLI and utilized pytest-cov for generating a coverage report. As always, the merged commit for changes to the repo can be found here. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Testing in Python
    After looking through the various unit testing tools available for Python like pytest, unittest (built-in), and nose, I went with pytest for its simlpicity and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Testing and Refactoring With pytest and pytest-cov
    Up until now we've been using python's unittest module. This was chosen as a first step since it comes with python out of the box. Now that we've gone over dev dependencies I think it's a good time to look at pytest as a unit test alternative. I highly recommend getting accustomed to pytest as it's used quite often in the python ecosystem to handle testing for projects. It's also a bit more user friendly in how it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Cucumber mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pytest and Cucumber, you can also consider the following products

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

unittest - Testing Frameworks

Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...

RSpec - RSpec is a testing tool for the Ruby programming language born under the banner of Behavior-Driven Development featuring a rich command line program, textual descriptions of examples, and more.

PHPUnit - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and Testing Frameworks

Loading...