Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

PuTTY VS WhiteSource

Compare PuTTY VS WhiteSource and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
WhiteSource

Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
Rclone UI
The cross-platform GUI for Rclone. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, WhiteSource seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 149

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
WhiteSource
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk whitesourcesoftware.com
Pricing —
Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Platforms —
Windows iOS Android Mac OSX Linux PHP JavaScript Java Python Slack C++ .Net Go C Ruby Swift +13
Listed in
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1
Web Application Security Security & Privacy Open Source Security Web And Mobile Application Security DevSecOps DevOps Tools +4

About PuTTY and WhiteSource

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

PuTTY
WhiteSource

No description of PuTTY yet.

WhiteSource is the leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management. It integrates with your development environments and DevOps pipeline to detect open source libraries with security or compliance issues in real-time. WhiteSource doesn’t only alert on issues, it...

Read more about WhiteSource

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
WhiteSource 3 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • WhiteSource Core
    Integrate open source security and compliance testing into all stages of you SDLC
  • WhiteSource Priortize
    Cut up to 85% of your security alerts based in the execution path
  • WhiteSource for Developers
    Alert on issues in your developers' environment UI (browser, IDE, repos) and support a quicker remediation

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
WhiteSource

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Overall verdict

  • Overall, WhiteSource is widely regarded as a strong tool for organizations that rely heavily on open source components. It's especially well-regarded for its ease of integration, robust reporting capabilities, and the comprehensive nature of its vulnerability database.

Why this product is good

  • WhiteSource is considered good by many users because it provides comprehensive open source security and license compliance management. It automates the process of tracking open source components in your software to ensure compliance and security, helping to identify and remediate vulnerabilities efficiently.

Recommended for

    WhiteSource is recommended for software development teams, security professionals, and compliance officers who need to manage open source usage in their projects. It's particularly beneficial for organizations with a significant reliance on open source components or those with strict compliance requirements.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
WhiteSource 2 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Webinar- Automating Open Source Security: A SANS Review of WhiteSource

More videos

  • - Use open source without compromising on security or agility

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
WhiteSource
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
Security & Privacy
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
Security
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and WhiteSource. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
WhiteSource no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PuTTY 0 mentions
WhiteSource 1 mention

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

  • Usage of opensource libraries
    Long term, you may want to include some Tool, like Whitesource in your CI. Do not consider this as an advertising, it is not. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to PuTTY and WhiteSource

When comparing PuTTY and WhiteSource, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...