Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

PuTTY VS MacKeeper

Compare PuTTY VS MacKeeper and see what are their differences

PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
MacKeeper

The new MacKeeper app delivers multilayered protection from malware, online threats, and identity theft & Mac performance optimization. Learn what is MacKeeper.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
€5.92 / Monthly (Protect and optimize up to 3 household Macs for the whole year)
Alternatives Is it good?
RealUptime.io
Uptime monitoring, status pages, and error tracking that show every region's reading, not one green dot. Flat pricing, no per-subscriber fees, real free tier. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, MacKeeper seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
SSH popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 199

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

PuTTY
MacKeeper
Website chiark.greenend.org.uk mackeeper.com
Pricing —
€5.92 / Monthly (Protect and optimize up to 3 household Macs for the whole year) Official pricing
Platforms —
Mac OSX
Listed in
SSH Server Management Server Configuration And Automation Cloud Computing +1
Utilities Monitoring Tools Data Cleansing Antivirus Security & Privacy Cleaning Services +3

About PuTTY and MacKeeper

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

PuTTY
MacKeeper

No description of PuTTY yet.

MacKeeper: a forward-thinking app that will protect your Mac and enhance its productivity MacKeeper is an advanced multifunctional security app for Macs. It will protect your computer from viruses and malware, boost its productivity and make sure it always has enough free disk space. With this...

Read more about MacKeeper

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

PuTTY 5 features
MacKeeper 4 features
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.
  • Cleaning
  • Security
  • Performance optimized
  • Privacy

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

PuTTY
MacKeeper

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Overall verdict

  • Opinions on MacKeeper are mixed. While some users appreciate the ease of use and all-in-one suite of utilities, others remain skeptical due to its historical reputation. Recent versions have shown improvements, but many users still prefer alternative solutions with more transparent track records.

Why this product is good

  • MacKeeper has been a controversial application for many years. Initially, it was criticized for aggressive marketing tactics and perceived security vulnerabilities. Over time, the company has made efforts to rebrand and improve their reputation, enhancing the software's functionality and security features. MacKeeper offers a range of tools meant to enhance system performance, privacy, and security.

Recommended for

    MacKeeper may be suitable for users who prefer a comprehensive, all-in-one solution for Mac optimization and security, and are comfortable with the company's past. However, it's important for users to research and weigh the pros and cons, and consider alternatives such as built-in macOS tools or other trusted third-party software.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

PuTTY 3 videos + Add
MacKeeper 3 videos + Add

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

MacKeeper-Malware Or Valid Util?

More videos

  • - THE MACKEEPER RABBIT HOLE!?! - Virus Investigations 29
  • - STAY AWAY FROM “MACKEEPER”, HERE’S WHY!

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
PuTTY
MacKeeper
100% 100%
SSH
0% 0%
0% 0%
Utilities
100% 100%
100% 100%
Server Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
OS & Utilities
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using PuTTY and MacKeeper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

PuTTY no reviews yet
MacKeeper no reviews yet

View more

  • Best Apps Uninstaller for Mac in 2022
    www.macupdate.com · Apr 2022

    MacKeeper also includes antivirus monitoring, a VPN, and an ad blocker to bolster your online security. And yet despite its extensive feature set, it has a clean and simple to understand user interface that makes...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

PuTTY 0 mentions
MacKeeper 1 mention

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to PuTTY and MacKeeper

When comparing PuTTY and MacKeeper, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...