Purelymail VS git-sizer

• Affordability
  Purelymail offers a cost-effective email solution with low pricing compared to many competitors, making it an attractive option for users looking to save on email hosting fees.
• Transparency
  The service provides a transparent pricing structure and detailed documentation, including comprehensive information about their privacy policy and security practices.
• Customization
  Purelymail allows for a high level of customization with user-configurable features, enabling users to tailor their email experience to their specific needs.
• Privacy Focus
  With a strong emphasis on user privacy, Purelymail limits data collection and provides controls over personal data, appealing to privacy-conscious users.
• No Advertisements
  Purelymail does not include advertisements in their email service, allowing for a cleaner and more professional user experience without distractions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Ecosystem
  Purelymail offers fewer integrations and add-on services compared to larger providers like Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, potentially limiting functionality for some users.
• Smaller User Base
  As a smaller company in the email service market, Purelymail may have fewer resources for development and customer support compared to larger competitors.
• Brand Recognition
  The brand is less known than major email providers, which might influence trust or willingness to switch for some users who prefer established companies.
• DIY Approach
  The service requires a more hands-on approach to setup and configuration, which might be challenging for users who are not technically inclined.
• Lack of Mobile Apps
  Purelymail does not provide dedicated mobile apps, potentially causing inconvenience for users who prefer managing emails through apps rather than a browser.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

No analysis of Purelymail yet.

• Rated 5/5 by David Beinder
  SaaSHub review

  · Jul 2023

  No issues with email deliverability so far, and very cost effective. There is also usage-based billing which starts at 4$/year and should end up cheaper than the flat rate for most use cases. No extra cost per domain...

• Moving away from GMail
  rolisz.ro · Apr 2020

  Besides the low price, PurelyMail has one more awesome thing: you pay for storage, not for users. So if you have a custom domain, you can create as many users as you want and you won't pay extra. All you will pay for...

We have no reviews of git-sizer yet. Be the first one to post

• Launch HN: AgentMail (YC S25) – An API that gives agents their own email inboxes

  Https://blog.cloudflare.com/email-service/ So yes it supports both and this feature was recently added (september 2025) & its still in private beta or something similar but yes now its possible. But I have still written parts of the... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (December 2025)

  You may want to check out https://purelymail.com who are pretty close to your target pricing. I've been using them since forever and have no reasons to switch but it is always great to see more players in the niche! - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Proton Mail Suspended Journalist Accounts at Request of Cybersecurity Agency

  I love https://purelymail.com/ for the same reason. Unlimited domains and you can pay based on usage. I pay about 1 cent per day. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago