Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PureBasic VS GNU Pascal

Compare PureBasic VS GNU Pascal and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

PureBasic logo PureBasic

Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

GNU Pascal logo GNU Pascal

The GNU Pascal Compiler (GPC) is, as the name says, the Pascal compiler of the GNU family,
  • PureBasic Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21
  • GNU Pascal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-07-14

PureBasic features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    PureBasic supports Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, allowing developers to write code once and run it on multiple operating systems without modifications.
  • Simple Syntax
    The language has a straightforward and easy-to-learn syntax, making it accessible for beginners and enabling rapid development.
  • Fast Executables
    PureBasic compiles directly to native machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal dependencies.
  • Comprehensive Standard Library
    The language provides a wide range of built-in libraries that simplify tasks like GUI creation, networking, and multimedia management.
  • Active Community
    PureBasic has an active and supportive community, offering forums, tutorials, and third-party resources that can help developers solve problems and enhance their projects.

Possible disadvantages of PureBasic

  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    Compared to more popular languages, PureBasic has fewer third-party libraries and frameworks, which can limit functionality and integrations.
  • Niche Market
    PureBasic is not as widely used as other programming languages, which can result in fewer job opportunities and community resources.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    The language is designed to be simple, which means it may lack some advanced programming constructs and paradigms found in other languages.
  • License Cost
    PureBasic is not free software; there is a one-time cost associated with obtaining a license, which may be a consideration for developers or small businesses with budget constraints.
  • Basic IDE
    The integrated development environment that comes with PureBasic is quite basic compared to modern IDEs, potentially impacting coding efficiency.

GNU Pascal features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PureBasic and GNU Pascal)

PureBasic

GNU Pascal

IDE
82 82%
IDE
18% 18
Text Editors
79 79%
Text Editors
21% 21
Programming Language
86 86%
Programming Language
14% 14
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PureBasic and GNU Pascal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PureBasic and GNU Pascal, you can also consider the following products

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

Free Pascal - Free Pascal (aka FPK Pascal) is a 32 and 64 bit professional Pascal compiler.

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

Lazarus - Lazarus is a cross-platform IDE for the Free Pascal compiler.

PowerBASIC - PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

PascalABC.NET - The new generation Pascal programming language that combines simplicity of classic Pascal, a great number of modern extensions and broad capabilities of Microsoft .NET Framework

Loading...