
CodeRabbit
Codacy
codebeat
Refactor.io
CodeStream
Code Review by Codementor
qodo.ai
Code review as a service

Tantivy
Typesense
OpenSearch
ElasticSearch
Apache Solr
Algolia
Meilisearch
Open-source & cloud-native log management & analytics

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Quickwit should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentioned 14 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | pullrequest.com | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.
No description of Quickwit yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and Quickwit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code... Source: about 5 years ago
Nice... it's cool to see how different companies are putting together best fit solutions. I'm also glad that they at least started out with off the shelf apps instead of jumping to something like a bespoke solution early on. Quickwit[1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit to_tsvector in PG never worked well for my use cases SELECT * FROM dump WHERE to_tsvector('english'::regconfig, hh_fullname) @@ to_tsquery('english'::regconfig, 'query'); Wish them to succeed.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
We tested S3 Express for our search engine quickwit[0] a couple of weeks ago. While this was really satisfying on the performance side, we were a bit disappointed by the price, and I mostly agree with the article on this matter. I can... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
When comparing PullRequest.com and Quickwit, you can also consider the following products.

Unleash AI on Your Code Reviews with CodeRabbit
Compare CodeRabbit to PullRequest.com or Quickwit:

🐎 On average 2x faster than Lucene 🔎 Full-text search ⚙️ Configurable tokenizer (stemming available for 17 languages) 🚀 Tiny startup time (<10ms) ⌨️ Natural and Phrase Queries ䷴ Range Queries 🛠 Incremental Indexing 💨 Multi-threaded Indexing 🔩 JSON F…
Compare Tantivy to PullRequest.com or Quickwit:

Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Compare Codacy to PullRequest.com or Quickwit:

Typo tolerant, delightfully simple, open source search 🔍
Compare Typesense to PullRequest.com or Quickwit:


OpenSearch is a community-driven, open source search and analytics suite derived from Apache 2.0 licensed Elasticsearch 7.10.2 & Kibana 7.10.2. It consists of a search engine daemon, and a visualization and user interface, OpenSearch Dashboards.
Compare OpenSearch to PullRequest.com or Quickwit: