Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PullRequest.com VS Mergify

Compare PullRequest.com VS Mergify and see what are their differences

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

Mergify logo Mergify

Stop merging your pull requests manually
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

  • Mergify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

PullRequest.com

$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Mergify features and specs

  • Automation
    Mergify allows for automated merging of pull requests based on predefined rules, reducing manual intervention and increasing efficiency.
  • Customization
    Users can create custom rules tailored to their specific workflow needs, allowing for a highly flexible and personalized integration with GitHub.
  • Time-saving
    By automating repetitive tasks such as labeling, merging, and closing pull requests, teams can save significant time and focus on more critical development activities.
  • Multi-queue Support
    Mergify supports multiple merging queues, enabling teams to manage complex merging scenarios and prioritize important changes accordingly.
  • Integration with GitHub
    Seamless integration with GitHub ensures that developers can continue using their preferred platform while benefiting from enhanced automation features.

Possible disadvantages of Mergify

  • Complexity for New Users
    Setting up Mergify with custom rules may have a learning curve for users unfamiliar with its configuration, potentially leading to initial setup challenges.
  • Cost
    For larger teams or projects, the subscription costs for Mergify might be a consideration, especially if the full set of features are not being utilized.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    As Mergify is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub, it may not be suitable for teams using other version control systems or requiring cross-platform support.
  • Limited Feature Visibility
    Some users may find it challenging to quickly visualize or audit the automated actions performed by Mergify, particularly in projects with numerous rules or complex conditions.
  • Potential for Misconfiguration
    Improper configuration of automation rules can lead to unintended behavior, such as premature merging of incomplete pull requests or erroneous labeling.

PullRequest.com videos

No PullRequest.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Mergify videos

Automatiser vos pull requests avec Mergify par Julien Danjou

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PullRequest.com and Mergify)
Developer Tools
63 63%
37% 37
Code Coverage
59 59%
41% 41
Code Quality
61 61%
39% 39
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and Mergify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PullRequest.com and Mergify

PullRequest.com Reviews

We have no reviews of PullRequest.com yet.
Be the first one to post

Mergify Reviews

Streamline dependency updates with Mergify and Snyk
Mergify is a powerful, innovative tool designed to automate your GitHub workflows, allowing you to focus more on crafting excellent software and less on fiddly administration tasks. At its core, Mergify is a pull request automation service that helps you create custom workflows based on specific conditions you define. This could include automatically merging, closing,...
Source: snyk.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Mergify should be more popular than PullRequest.com. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

Mergify mentions (9)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PullRequest.com and Mergify, you can also consider the following products

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

SideCI V.2 - GitHub Integrated Automated Code Review Service

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

Code Review by Codementor - Get an expert to review your code on-demand

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE