Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PullRequest.com VS Java4s

Compare PullRequest.com VS Java4s and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

PullRequest.com logo PullRequest.com

Code review as a service

Java4s logo Java4s

Java4s is a web-based java tutorial site that is created for developers and students.
  • PullRequest.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-06

PullRequest combines automation with a network of on-demand reviewers from companies like Google, Dropbox, and Amazon. With thousands of expert reviewers, we can review projects of any size or technical area. Integrated directly into GitHub, Bitbucket, and Gitlab.

  • Java4s Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-02-14

PullRequest.com

Website
pullrequest.com
Pricing URL
Official PullRequest.com Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $99.0 / Monthly (for individual developers)
Platforms
iOS Android C C++ .Net PHP Objective-C Magento Erlang Scala Elixir TypeScript Go Swift Groovy Ruby Perl JavaScript Java Python
Edit details

Java4s

Website
java4s.com
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Edit details

PullRequest.com features and specs

  • Expert Code Reviewers
    PullRequest.com provides access to a network of experienced code reviewers with expertise in various programming languages and technologies, ensuring that your code is thoroughly and insightfully reviewed.
  • Improved Code Quality
    By leveraging professional code reviewers, the platform helps enhance code quality by identifying potential bugs, suggesting improvements, and ensuring adherence to coding standards.
  • Scalability
    The service can scale with your team's needs, whether you require sporadic code reviews for small projects or consistent evaluations for large development teams.
  • Time-Saving
    Outsourcing code reviews can save developers and teams significant time, allowing them to focus on other important tasks and speeding up the development process.
  • Objective Feedback
    External reviewers can provide unbiased, objective feedback without internal team dynamics influencing the review process, leading to more open and honest evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of PullRequest.com

  • Cost
    Using PullRequest.com may introduce additional expenses, which could be a concern for startups or companies with limited budgets compared to in-house reviews.
  • Security Concerns
    Sharing code externally may raise security concerns, especially for companies handling sensitive or proprietary information, despite security measures in place.
  • Integration Overhead
    Integrating an external review process into existing workflows may require adjustments, which could initially disrupt established development processes.
  • Variable Quality
    While many reviewers are highly skilled, the quality of reviews can vary depending on the reviewer assigned, potentially leading to inconsistent review quality.
  • Limited Context
    External reviewers may lack full context of the project details and organizational goals, which might impact the relevance of their suggestions compared to an in-house team.

Java4s features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PullRequest.com and Java4s)

PullRequest.com

Java4s

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
Tool
100% 100
Code Coverage
100 100%
Code Coverage
0% 0
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PullRequest.com and Java4s. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PullRequest.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PullRequest.com mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: Co-Founder? Seeking Co-Founder?
    I am a tech guy. Have 15+ years experience building backend systems. Now, I build user facing websites/services and release them. I have no knowledge of marketing/sales, so if you are a non tech guy who wants to do some fun projects, hit me up. Email in profile. Currently, I am working on a website where people can post their code and ask for feedback. (Something http://pullrequest.com/) Note that these are mostly... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Anyone has previously hired a programmer on Fiverr?
    Reviewing the code will be another hurdle for you. If you don't stay on top of this you will end up with an expensive POS. Maybe your friend can just do the code reviews for a cut? Otherwise, try something like pullrequest.com (code review as a service). Source: almost 4 years ago

Java4s mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Java4s yet. Tracking of Java4s recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PullRequest.com and Java4s, you can also consider the following products

codebeat - Automated code review for Swift

Dzone - Dzone is one of the most leading websites that offer a range of programming, development, and DevOps news, tutorials, and tools for beginners to expert developers.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Codejava - Codejava is a web-based platform that offers a range of Java programming tutorials for both students and developers to polish their skills.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.

manik-hot-deploy - Manik Hot-Depoy is an eclipse plugin for hot deploy of web applications

Loading...