Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Proxyman.io VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Proxyman.io VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Proxyman.io logo Proxyman.io

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Proxyman.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-25

Modern and Delightful HTTP Debugging Proxy Proxyman is a native, high-performance macOS application, which enables developers to observe and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS requests.

  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Proxyman.io features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Proxyman.io provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, ensuring a broad range of users can utilize the tool.
  • Real-time Traffic Interception
    Proxyman.io offers real-time traffic interception and inspection, enabling users to debug and analyze traffic as it happens.
  • HTTPS Decryption
    The tool supports HTTPS decryption, allowing users to view encrypted traffic for more thorough analysis.
  • Customizable Filters
    Users can set up customizable filters to focus on specific types of traffic or protocols, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Proxyman.io provides detailed documentation and tutorials, helping users to make the most of the software.
  • Active Community and Support
    The tool has an active community and responsive support team, providing assistance and updates regularly.

Possible disadvantages of Proxyman.io

  • Cost
    While Proxyman.io offers a free trial, the full version is paid, which might be a barrier for some users or smaller organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still experience a learning curve to fully utilize all features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the system when intercepting high volumes of traffic.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version has limitations in terms of features and volume of traffic it can handle, which may necessitate purchasing the paid version for extensive use.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Like any software, it can have occasional bugs or performance issues, although these are generally addressed quickly by the development team.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Analysis of Proxyman.io

Overall verdict

  • Proxyman.io is generally considered a good tool for developers in need of a robust and intuitive proxy tool. It provides essential features for network traffic analysis with a clean and modern interface.

Why this product is good

  • Proxyman.io is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and powerful features that make it an effective tool for web debugging. It supports a range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, and offers functionalities such as breakpoints, request/response modification, and SSL proxying. Its integration with MacOS makes it a preferred choice for developers in that ecosystem.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • Mobile developers
  • Security researchers
  • Quality assurance engineers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Proxyman.io and Commit Together by Github)
Developer Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Security
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Proxyman.io and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Proxyman.io and Commit Together by Github

Proxyman.io Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Proxyman just like Paw is a native macOS web debugging proxy application. This tool stands as an intermediary or a man-in-the-middle server. With its built-in macOS setup, you can capture, inspect and get around HTTP(s) traffic, request, and responses easily. What set Proxyman aside from Paw is the fact that it is more advance in functionalities.
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Similar to the above-mentioned Paw, Proxyman is a premium native macOS web debugging proxy application.
Source: geekflare.com
Comparing Charles Proxy, Fiddler, Wireshark, and Requestly
On the pricing front, Requestly strikes a balance between affordability and functionality. It is an open-source tool, offering freemium to individual developers and affordable pricing plans for team collaboration. We have also clearly differentiated how Requestly differs from Wireshark and other web debugging tools like Proxyman, Modheader, and HTTP ToolKit separately.
Source: dev.to

Commit Together by Github Reviews

We have no reviews of Commit Together by Github yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Proxyman.io seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 25 links to Proxyman.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Proxyman.io mentions (25)

  • Catching useful errors when parsing JSON fails in Swift
    Armed with this you could now investigate the raw JSON using HTTP proxying (I like to use ProxyMan for this), and/or talk to the back-end team, see if they've made some changes and are aware of the breakage in the contract between client and server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Show HN: Pākiki Proxy – An intercepting proxy for penetration pesting
    I previously used Proxyman [1] on iOS to the http requests send over TLS. It worked rather nicely. Proxyman in this case starts a VPN which handles all the traffic. It uses custom certificate to decrypt the messages. [1] https://proxyman.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • A collection of useful Mac Apps
    Proxyman - Price: Free (optional paid plans available) Modern and intuitive HTTP/HTTPS debugging proxy app for macOS. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What are your favorite apps that has active development? (frequent new features, bug fixes, etc)
    I'm using self-developed app MindMac daily to talk with ChatGPT, Proxyman to capture network, TablePlus to access databases and CleanshotX to take screenshots. All of them are currently in an active status. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Mac Power Users 690: Better Touch Tool with Andreas Hegenberg
    Links and Show Notes:More Power Users: Ad-free episodes with regular bonus segmentsSubmit Feedbackfolivora.ai - Great Tools for your Mac!iPhone Praktikum 2009GitHub - quicklywilliam/multiclutch: Customization App for Macbooks with MultiTouch supportHopperFSMonitorProxyman · Native, Modern Web Debugging Proxy · Inspect network traffic from Mac, iOS, Android devices with easeCharles Web Debugging Proxy • HTTP... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Proxyman.io and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Charles Proxy - HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

HTTP Toolkit - Beautiful, cross-platform & open-source tools to debug, test & build with HTTP(S). One-click setup for browsers, servers, Android, CLI tools, scripts and more.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

mitmproxy - mitmproxy is an SSL-capable man-in-the-middle proxy for HTTP.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom