
Envoy
The Receptionist
TractionGuest
SwipedOn
Teem
WhosOnLocation
VisitorTrack
Connect with Confidence

Helicone AI
Langfuse
Portkey
MarginWard
LangSmith
LangChain
PerUnit
Track AI cost and margin per customer. Real-time profitability insights, Stripe revenue sync, budget alerts, and a cost simulator to find cheaper models without changing code.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, MarginDash seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | proxyclick.com | margindash.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Company | Startup from Belgium · 10 - 19 employees · 2004 | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Proxyclick is a cloud-based solution transforming how employees, visitors, and contractors flow in and out of locations around the world. With Proxyclick, organizations ensure people are welcomed safely and efficiently on-site while ensuring all work locations are secure and comply with data...
MarginDash tracks AI API costs per customer and connects them to revenue. If you're building a SaaS that makes API calls to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or other providers on behalf of your customers, MarginDash shows you which customers are profitable and which are underwater. You add a few lines...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Proxyclick yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How to create custom flows with Proxyclick?
More videos
No MarginDash videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Proxyclick and MarginDash.
MarginDash's answer:
Ruby on Rails, PostgreSQL, TypeScript, Python
MarginDash's answer:
Most AI observability tools track what your API calls cost. MarginDash tracks whether your customers are profitable. It connects AI costs to actual Stripe revenue and shows realized margin per customer — the number that determines your pricing and where to cut costs.
MarginDash's answer:
Three reasons: it connects cost to revenue (competitors only show cost), the cost simulator ranks alternative models by intelligence per dollar so you know quality won't drop, and the SDK never touches your prompts or responses — just metadata.
MarginDash's answer:
SaaS founders and engineering teams that resell AI API features to their customers and need to know which customers are profitable after AI costs.
Share your experience with using Proxyclick and MarginDash. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Proxyclick since Mar 2021.
Tag every API call with a customer ID and feature name, then compute cost per call from token counts against current model pricing. That gives you per-customer cost attribution instead of just an aggregate bill. Budget caps per customer... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
When comparing Proxyclick and MarginDash, you can also consider the following products.

Visitor registration that's changing how guests are greeted in companies around the world.
Compare Envoy to Proxyclick or MarginDash:

Open-source LLM Observability for Developers
Compare Helicone AI to Proxyclick or MarginDash:

The Receptionost is a visitor managemnt solution that has visitor logging system to track visitor traffic.
Compare The Receptionist to Proxyclick or MarginDash:

Langfuse is an open-source LLM engineering platform that helps teams collaboratively debug, analyze, and iterate on their LLM applications.
Compare Langfuse to Proxyclick or MarginDash:


Build production-grade & reliable AI apps with Portkey
Compare Portkey to Proxyclick or MarginDash: