Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Proton Native VS Sciter

Compare Proton Native VS Sciter and see what are their differences

Proton Native logo Proton Native

A React environment for cross platform native desktop app

Sciter logo Sciter

Embeddable HTML/CSS/script engine
  • Proton Native Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28
  • Sciter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-11

Proton Native features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Proton Native allows developers to build applications that run on multiple operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux with a single codebase, enhancing accessibility and reach.
  • Native Performance
    By using native components, Proton Native applications often achieve better performance and responsiveness compared to web-based solutions.
  • JavaScript and React
    Developers familiar with JavaScript and React can quickly adapt to using Proton Native, leveraging their existing skills to build desktop applications.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source framework, Proton Native allows developers to contribute to its development or customize it to better fit their project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Proton Native

  • Maturity and Stability
    Proton Native is less mature compared to other frameworks like Electron, which means it might have more bugs or lack certain features that developers expect.
  • Community and Support
    The community around Proton Native is smaller, which can make finding support and resources more challenging for developers new to the framework.
  • Limited Libraries and Tools
    Compared to more established frameworks, Proton Native may have fewer third-party libraries and tools available, limiting the ease of development for more complex applications.
  • Documentation
    The available documentation for Proton Native may not be as comprehensive or updated as other frameworks, making it harder for developers to understand and use effectively.

Sciter features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Sciter's runtime is very small compared to other frameworks, making applications fast and efficient with low memory consumption.
  • Self-contained
    Sciter is a single DLL with no dependencies required. This simplifies deployment and reduces potential conflicts with other libraries.
  • Good performance
    The framework provides a balance between modern web technologies and high performance by utilizing native C++ code.
  • Cross-platform
    Sciter works on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, allowing developers to write applications that run on multiple platforms without additional effort.
  • Rich UI capabilities
    The framework allows the creation of complex and responsive user interfaces using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
  • Offline applications
    Sciter does not require a web server as it can run entirely offline, which is beneficial for certain application types.
  • Active development and support
    Sciter is actively maintained and supported, with regular updates and a responsive support system available.

Possible disadvantages of Sciter

  • Limited community
    Sciter has a smaller community compared to more popular frameworks like Electron or Qt, making it harder to find resources or peer support.
  • Proprietary technology
    Sciter is not open-source, which might be a drawback for developers who prefer or require open-source solutions.
  • Documentation
    While improving, some developers may find Sciter's documentation less comprehensive compared to more established frameworks.
  • Learning curve
    Developers familiar with web development will have to adapt to Sciter's specific quirks and methods, which may have a learning curve.
  • Limited integration tools
    Sciter does not have as extensive a range of third-party tools and plugins as more popular frameworks, affecting integration with other systems.

Analysis of Sciter

Overall verdict

  • Sciter is generally considered a good option for developers who are looking for a lightweight and efficient way to build desktop applications with web technologies.

Why this product is good

  • Sciter offers several advantages including a small footprint, easy integration, and the ability to create cross-platform desktop applications using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It does not require a separate run-time installation, which simplifies deployment. Additionally, it supports modern web standards, ensuring that developers can utilize the latest web technologies in their applications. Its focus on performance makes it suitable for resource-constrained environments.

Recommended for

    Sciter is recommended for developers who need to build GUI applications that are cross-platform and want to leverage their web development skills. It's especially useful for those looking to create lightweight applications without the overhead of more extensive frameworks like Electron. It is also suitable for developers interested in rapid prototyping and creating custom UI/UX solutions.

Proton Native videos

Getting Started With Proton Native

Sciter videos

No Sciter videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Proton Native and Sciter)
Development Tools
20 20%
80% 80
Rapid Application Development
Cross-Platform Development
Cross-Platform Desktop Development

User comments

Share your experience with using Proton Native and Sciter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Proton Native and Sciter

Proton Native Reviews

Electron.js Alternatives For Cross-Platform Development
Proton Native allows developers to create effective cross-platform solutions using React Syntax. It uses the same syntax as React Native and allows developers to utilize all the available react-libraries for creating complex desktop solutions with ease.
Source: www.atatus.com
Electron Alternatives๏นฃ5 Best JavaScript Frameworks for Desktop Apps
Proton Native is a fresh release. It was made available on GitHub in the early months of 2018. What Proton Native does for desktop app development is similar to what React Native has done for mobile.
Source: brainhub.eu

Sciter Reviews

We have no reviews of Sciter yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sciter seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 71 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Proton Native mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Proton Native yet. Tracking of Proton Native recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Sciter mentions (71)

  • Show HN: Vaev โ€“ A browser engine built from scratch (It renders google.com)
    There is also https://sciter.com/ that the author tried to find finance to make it opensource but couldn't find enough supporters. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Servo in 2024: stats, features and donations
    > I'm convinced that using an embedded browser engine to render app UI is the future. Sciter exists: https://sciter.com/ And it indeed is great for UI. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Blitz: A lightweight, modular, extensible web renderer
    I think Sciter is probably the better comparison: https://sciter.com/ It is a ground-up implementation of HTML and CSS rendering. IIRC it used to have its own programming language but now uses JS. Iโ€™ve long been interested in this kind of thing but havenโ€™t actually played with Sciter in depth. Used to be that the licensing was a concern but looking at the site now it seems the terms have changed to be much more... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • So You Want to Build a Browser Engine
    Seems a good place to mention https://sciter.com/ It's been on HN loads of times. A "browser" engine but very narrow scope. Works a treat for LOB type apps. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Dropflow, a CSS layout engine for node or <canvas>
    > wondering if css and svg could be used as abstraction over graphics and UI libraries There's another project called Sciter that uses CSS to target native graphics libraries: https://sciter.com > I wonder how hard it was to implement css. I've heard it can be pretty complex. It was hard, but the biggest barrier is the obscurity of the knowledge. Text layout is the hardest, because working with glyphs and... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Proton Native and Sciter, you can also consider the following products

Electron - Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies

NW.js - nwjs

Flutter - Build beautiful native apps in record time ๐Ÿš€

NeutralinoJS - Neutralino is a lightweight application development framework.

Ultralight - Fast, light HTML UI solution for C++ apps

DeskGap - Framework for building cross-platform desktop apps with web technologies (JavaScript, HTML and CSS).