Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Project Reactor VS RxJS

Compare Project Reactor VS RxJS and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Project Reactor logo Project Reactor

Project Reactor home

RxJS logo RxJS

Reactive Extensions for Javascript
  • Project Reactor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21
  • RxJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

Project Reactor features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RxJS features and specs

  • Asynchronous Programming Model
    RxJS allows you to work with asynchronous data streams with ease, enabling you to handle events, Ajax requests, and other asynchronous operations more effectively.
  • Composability
    RxJS operators enable developers to compose complex asynchronous operations concisely. This provides greater flexibility and power over handling streams of data.
  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    By using a functional programming approach, RxJS promotes cleaner and more predictable code. It encourages immutability and side-effect-free functions, enhancing code maintainability.
  • Rich Operator Set
    RxJS has a comprehensive set of operators, which allows developers to transform, combine, and filter data streams in various ways without needing to write a lot of boilerplate code.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    With its active community and extensive ecosystem, RxJS provides robust support, an abundance of learning resources, and numerous integrations with other libraries and frameworks.

Possible disadvantages of RxJS

  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with reactive programming concepts or functional programming, understanding RxJS can be challenging, potentially leading to difficulty in adopting it.
  • Overhead for Simple Tasks
    Using RxJS for simple asynchronous tasks might add unnecessary complexity compared to native JavaScript promises or async/await due to its powerful abstractions.
  • Bundle Size
    In certain circumstances, incorporating RxJS might lead to increased bundle sizes, which can be a concern for web performance if not managed properly.
  • Complex Debugging
    RxJS introduces a level of abstraction that can make debugging more complex, especially when dealing with multiple combined and transformed data streams.
  • Performance Overhead
    While RxJS is powerful, its generalized approach to handling asynchronous stream processing can introduce performance overhead if not used judiciously.

Project Reactor videos

Creating and Processing a Large Composite Object with Project Reactor

RxJS videos

RxJS is My Favorite Library

More videos:

  • Review - Reactive Programming with RxJS - James Churchill
  • Review - Tero Parviainen "Reactive Music Apps in Angular and RxJS"

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Project Reactor and RxJS)
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Project Reactor and RxJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Project Reactor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Project Reactor mentions (12)

  • Is it wrong to use "try-catch" inside a reactive stream operator (project reactor)?
    I was exploring reactive streams with project reactor and I encountered a use case where I needed to skip to the next event if an error occurred during the processing of the current event (e.g. Deserialization issue). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Modern Async Primitives on iOS, Android, and the Web
    Kotlin also has a construct for asynchronous collections/streams. Kotlin's version of AsyncSequence is called a Flow. Just as Swift's AsyncSequence builds upon prior experience with RxSwift and Combine, Kotlin's Flow APIs build upon earlier stream/collection APIs in the JVM ecosystem: Java's RxJava, Java8 Streams, Project Reactor, and Scala's Akka. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Alternatives to scala FP
    Java's projectreactor.io ? It is widely used in Java world, see Spring WebFlux. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Hydroflow: Dataflow Runtime in Rust
    I guess more a closer comparison would be with the Project Reactor https://projectreactor.io/ which is also a low level framework for data processing. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Reactive Backend Applications with Spring Boot, Kotlin and Coroutines (Part 1)
    Spring Framework is one of the most popular choices for web applications. It comes with a great ecosystem, tooling, and support. Spring applications are mainly written in Java. While they can serve quite well in many different domains and use cases, they may not be a good fit for modern-day applications which require low-latency and high-throughput. This is where the reactive programming paradigm could help... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

RxJS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RxJS yet. Tracking of RxJS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Project Reactor and RxJS, you can also consider the following products

Netty - Cloud-based real estate management solution

Zustand - Bear necessities for state management in React

Ktor - Ktor is a tough gig developmental platform that comes with the support to build asynchronous servers and clients right in the kotlin.

Finagle - Finagle is aย protocol-agnostic RPC system.

Laravel - A PHP Framework For Web Artisans

axios - Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js - axios/axios