Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Private Packagist VS Gitify

Compare Private Packagist VS Gitify and see what are their differences

Private Packagist logo Private Packagist

Composer package archive as a service for PHP

Gitify logo Gitify

GitHub Notifications on your desktop.
  • Private Packagist Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-22
  • Gitify Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11

Private Packagist features and specs

  • Centralized Package Management
    Private Packagist offers a centralized platform to manage PHP dependencies, making it easier for organizations to control the distribution and versioning of their internal libraries and third-party packages.
  • Security
    By using Private Packagist, organizations can ensure that their packages are coming from a secure and trusted source, reducing the risk of using malicious or compromised packages from public repositories.
  • Access Control
    It allows users to assign access rights and roles to team members, which helps maintain security and ensures that only authorized personnel can manage and access specific packages.
  • Custom Domains
    Organizations can use custom domains for their private packages, helping in maintaining brand identity and allowing for easier package management within the company's ecosystem.
  • Integrated with Composer
    Private Packagist is natively integrated with Composer, the PHP dependency manager, ensuring seamless adoption and easy integration into existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Private Packagist

  • Cost
    Private Packagist is a paid service, which might not be ideal for smaller organizations or individual developers who have tight budget constraints.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service for package management means that any downtime or service interruptions could potentially impact development workflows.
  • Complex Setup
    Compared to using the default Composer setup, configuring and managing an additional platform might incur some initial complexity and a learning curve for development teams.
  • Limited to PHP
    Being a PHP-focused service, it is not suitable for projects that require management of dependencies for multiple programming languages outside the PHP ecosystem.

Gitify features and specs

  • Real-Time Notifications
    Gitify provides real-time notifications for GitHub activity, allowing users to be immediately aware of changes, comments, and other updates, thereby improving workflow efficiency.
  • Multi-Platform Support
    The app is available on multiple platforms, including macOS, Windows, and Linux, offering versatility and usability across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source application, Gitify allows users to review the source code, contribute to its development, and customize it to better fit their needs.
  • Clean User Interface
    Gitify features a clean and intuitive user interface that makes it easy to navigate and manage notifications without overwhelming the user.

Possible disadvantages of Gitify

  • Limited Integration
    Gitify is primarily focused on GitHub and may not integrate well with other version control platforms, which can be a drawback for teams using multiple services.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to some other notification management tools, Gitify may lack advanced features such as customized notification filtering or detailed analytics.
  • Possible Notification Overload
    Without proper filtering options, users might experience notification overload if they are part of numerous repositories, making it difficult to focus on important alerts.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Since Gitify relies heavily on GitHub's infrastructure, any issues or changes on GitHub's end could impact Gitify's functionality.

Private Packagist videos

Interview - Private Packagist Nils Adermann, Mathias Schreiber

Gitify videos

Gitify ะบะฐะบ ัˆะฒะตะนั†ะฐั€ัะบะธะน ะฝะพะถ ะดะปั MODX-ะฒะพะธะฝะฐ โ€“ ะ˜ะฒะฐะฝ ะšะปะธะผั‡ัƒะบ ะฝะฐ MODX Meetup Minsk #2, 2015

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Private Packagist and Gitify)
Package Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
15 15%
85% 85
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Private Packagist and Gitify. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Private Packagist seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Private Packagist mentions (7)

  • Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
    I was told in another forum to look at Private Packagist... But how is that different? Instead of installing packages from packagist.org.. You pay to Packagist.com to do the same thing? You just download from packagist.com cloud instead of packagist.org? Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    Https://packagist.com maybe tell them about a local packagist install. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
    "[MANAGER] requested this to be done in PHP. You as IT will know that most modern programming and scripting languages work only with packaging software properly. Composer sends requests (majority of cases) to packagist.com and to github.com. It will add thousands of hours to do everything that composer does manually. Please sign here to authorize the usage of 4000 hours and the possible delay of 4000 hours.... Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you think of SaaS Frameworks?
    Another downside that only really exists with non-PHP boilerplates is getting updates isn'T as easy. With PHP we're able to use packagist.com and make our code available via composer. Other languages don't have this so SaaS Pegasus provides zip downloads and Gravity provides access to a GitHub repo. This means you have to apply bug fixes yourself. With Parthenon, you do composer update and you'll get the latest... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Gitify mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Gitify yet. Tracking of Gitify recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Private Packagist and Gitify, you can also consider the following products

Satis - Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

GitPigeon - GitHub notifications delivered to your Mac

Sonatype Nexus Repository - The world's only repository manager with FREE support for popular formats.

Neat.run - Neat puts SaaS notifications in your menu bar. Streamline your code review and ship with ease. Preview, triage, and jump to issues in one click or keystroke.

Packagist - The PHP Package Repository

Meteorite - Smarter GitHub notifications.