Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Preme for Windows VS pkgsrc

Compare Preme for Windows VS pkgsrc and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Preme for Windows logo Preme for Windows

Speeds up your window switching.

pkgsrc logo pkgsrc

pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.
  • Preme for Windows Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-23
  • pkgsrc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-30

Preme for Windows features and specs

  • Customizability
    Preme for Windows allows users to extensively customize window management and behavior to suit personal preferences and workflows, enhancing productivity.
  • Productivity Enhancements
    The software provides a variety of features like shortcut keys and window snapping to improve multitasking and overall efficiency.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is designed to be user-friendly, making it simple for users to set up and navigate through the various customization options without a steep learning curve.
  • Lightweight
    Preme for Windows is a lightweight application that does not consume significant system resources, ensuring smooth performance.
  • Free
    Preme for Windows is available for free, making it accessible to a wide range of users without the need for any financial investment.

Possible disadvantages of Preme for Windows

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some users may experience compatibility issues with certain versions of Windows or specific applications, leading to unexpected behavior or crashes.
  • Limited Support
    As a free application, Preme for Windows might not provide extensive customer support or regular updates, potentially leaving users with unresolved issues.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic features are straightforward, mastering the more advanced customization options may require some time and experimentation.
  • Security Concerns
    Downloading and installing third-party software always comes with potential security risks, especially if the software is not regularly updated to patch vulnerabilities.
  • Lack of Official Documentation
    There may be limited official documentation or tutorials available, making it harder for users to fully utilize all features effectively.

pkgsrc features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Support
    pkgsrc is designed to be a portable package management system and can be used on a variety of Unix-like operating systems, including NetBSD, Solaris, Linux, and macOS. This cross-platform capability makes it a versatile tool for developers working in diverse environments.
  • Consistency Across Systems
    Using pkgsrc allows for a consistent package management experience regardless of the underlying operating system, reducing the learning curve and maintenance overhead for administrators managing multiple systems.
  • Comprehensive Package Collection
    pkgsrc offers a wide range of software packages, providing a robust collection that can meet diverse user needs from scientific libraries to web applications.
  • Quarterly Releases
    With quarterly releases, pkgsrc provides a balanced approach between stability and keeping software up to date, offering users new features regularly while maintaining reliability.
  • Flexible Build Options
    pkgsrc supports a flexible build system, allowing users to customize package builds with specific options or dependencies, tailored to their specific needs or system requirements.

Possible disadvantages of pkgsrc

  • Smaller Community
    Compared to other popular package management systems like apt (Debian/Ubuntu) or yum (RedHat/CentOS), pkgsrc has a relatively smaller community, which might affect the availability of support and community-driven improvements.
  • Potentially Older Software
    While pkgsrc maintains stable quarterly releases, it may occasionally lag behind other systems in terms of offering the very latest versions of certain software, which might not be ideal for users needing the newest features.
  • Manual Configuration
    Setting up pkgsrc might require manual interventions and configurations, which could pose a hurdle for users unfamiliar with its setup process or those who prefer more automated solutions.
  • Dependency Management
    Although pkgsrc is quite capable in dependency handling, some users may find its dependency resolution to be less automatic or seamless compared to other systems which offer more integrated solutions.
  • Performance Overhead
    Because it is designed to be cross-platform, there can be some performance overhead associated with using pkgsrc compared to native package managers that are optimized for specific operating systems.

Preme for Windows videos

PREME For Windows - Przyspiesz Przeล‚ฤ…czanie Okien

pkgsrc videos

pkgsrc on ChromeOS

More videos:

  • Review - Using pkgsrc for multi-platform deployments in heterogeneous environments, G Clifford Williams

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Preme for Windows and pkgsrc)
Window Manager
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
OSX Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Package Manager
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Preme for Windows and pkgsrc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pkgsrc seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Preme for Windows mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Preme for Windows yet. Tracking of Preme for Windows recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pkgsrc mentions (11)

  • Debian isn't waiting for 2038 to blow up, switches to 64-bit time for everything
    > Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012: https://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-6/NetBSD-6.0.html * OpenBSD in 2014: http://www.openbsd.org/55.html For packaging, NetBSD uses their (multi-platform) Pkgsrc, which has 29,000 packages, which probably covers a large swath of... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Our Audit of Homebrew
    > https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a larger pool of packages. Pkgsrc was running on Solaris before Joyent, Joyent built on top of it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Brioche โ€“ A new Nix-like package manager
    Https://pkgsrc.org/ from netbsd runs on many systems. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Installing packages without an internet connection?
    It seems according to pkgsrc.org that pkgin might follow the PKG_PATH environment variable. You're supposed to set PKG_PATH="http://cdn.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r|cut -f '1 2' -d.)/All/", and according to uname(1), -p gives the processor architecture and -r gives the operating system [kernel] release. Source: over 3 years ago
  • pkgsrc.se is no more :(
    It seems like pkgsrc.org hasnโ€™t got the news yet. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Preme for Windows and pkgsrc, you can also consider the following products

GridMove - GridMove - A window management tool that can quickly arrange your windows into desktop grids.

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

WinDock - WinDock is a window manager ideal for large, or multi-monitor setups. Features:

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS

QuickTile - A lightweight utility for allowing you to quickly snap windows to a tiling grid under your existing...

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.