Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

PowerBASIC VS jRuby

Compare PowerBASIC VS jRuby and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PowerBASIC logo PowerBASIC

PowerBASIC, formerly Turbo Basic, is the brand of several commercial compilers by PowerBASIC Inc.

jRuby logo jRuby

A high performance, stable, fully threaded Java implementation of the Ruby programming language
  • PowerBASIC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-18
  • jRuby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24

PowerBASIC features and specs

  • Performance
    PowerBASIC compiles to highly optimized machine code, resulting in fast and efficient executables with minimal overhead.
  • Compact Executables
    The language is known for creating small and compact executables which are beneficial for performance and memory usage, especially in resource-constrained environments.
  • Legacy Support
    It is well-suited for maintaining and updating legacy BASIC applications, providing continuity for long-standing projects.
  • Low-Level Programming
    PowerBASIC offers direct access to system hardware and memory manipulation, which can be a significant advantage for system programmers.
  • Ease of Use
    The syntax is relatively straightforward, especially for those already familiar with BASIC, reducing the learning curve for new users.

Possible disadvantages of PowerBASIC

  • Limited Modern Features
    PowerBASIC lacks some of the modern programming constructs and libraries that are available in more contemporary programming languages.
  • Platform Limitations
    Primarily designed for Windows, PowerBASIC does not offer native support for other platforms, limiting cross-platform development capabilities.
  • Smaller User Community
    The user community for PowerBASIC is smaller compared to more popular languages, which can lead to fewer resources for support and collaboration.
  • Proprietary Nature
    As a proprietary product, PowerBASIC may involve licensing fees and does not offer the open-source flexibility that some developers prefer.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The development and release of updates are less frequent compared to more mainstream programming environments, potentially impacting feature availability and bug fixes.

jRuby features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

PowerBASIC videos

+ Add

PowerBasic demos - MSXturboR/GFX9000 - 1994

jRuby videos

No jRuby videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PowerBASIC and jRuby)

PowerBASIC

jRuby

Programming Language
78 78%
Programming Language
22% 22
OOP
52 52%
OOP
48% 48
IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PowerBASIC and jRuby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PowerBASIC and jRuby, you can also consider the following products

PureBasic - Fantaisie Software Official WebSite. PureBasic - Feel The Pure Power. PureBasic is a programming language based on established BASIC rules.

Scala Lang - Scala is a pure-bred object-oriented language that runs on the JVM

Xojo - Real Software and Real Studio are now Xojo.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

FreeBASIC - FreeBASIC is a completely free, open-source, 32-bit BASIC compiler, with syntax similar to...

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

Loading...