Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Portmap.io VS socketify.py

Compare Portmap.io VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Portmap.io logo Portmap.io

Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Portmap.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-24
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Portmap.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Portmap.io offers a simple interface that makes it easy for users to set up port forwarding without needing advanced networking knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    The service supports multiple tunneling protocols including OpenVPN and SSH, providing versatility depending on user needs.
  • Cost-effective
    Portmap.io offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose a service level that fits their budget while still providing essential features.
  • Compatibility
    The service is compatible with various operating systems, making it accessible to a wide range of users.
  • No Need for Static IP
    Users can access their internal services over the internet without requiring a static IP address.

Possible disadvantages of Portmap.io

  • Limited Bandwidth
    The free plan has bandwidth limitations that may not be suitable for high-traffic applications.
  • Security Concerns
    Using port forwarding services can introduce security risks if not properly configured or if the service has vulnerabilities.
  • Reliability
    As with many online services, there can be downtime or maintenance periods which may affect service availability.
  • Dependency on Third-party Service
    Relying on an external service for port forwarding can be a disadvantage if the service experiences issues or discontinues.
  • Configuration Limits
    Advanced users might find the configuration options somewhat limited compared to setting up port forwarding manually on their own networks.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of Portmap.io

Overall verdict

  • Portmap.io is generally considered a good tool for its ease of use, reliability, and features such as SSL support and a user-friendly interface. However, users should be aware of potential security risks when exposing local services to the public internet.

Why this product is good

  • Portmap.io is a popular choice for users looking to expose local servers to the internet without dealing with complex network configurations like port forwarding. It provides a straightforward solution for developers wanting to test, share, or access services remotely.

Recommended for

    Developers, system administrators, and hobbyists who need to access local services remotely or those testing webhooks and other remote internet applications.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Portmap.io videos

Port Forward without Router using portmap.io

More videos:

  • Review - portmap.io portforwarding with Android FUD RAT live practical hindi
  • Review - NJRAT LimeRAT Portmap.io - free port forwarding solution NJRAT LimeRAT

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portmap.io and socketify.py)
Localhost Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Python
0 0%
100% 100
Webhooks
100 100%
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Portmap.io and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Portmap.io and socketify.py

Portmap.io Reviews

  1. WORST SERVICE i ever see

    Did not worked at all. No VPN connections, NO ssh connections... Did not work at all. No option to connect. Not working in my country and "No refund" :(

    I got fooled with such fake service. NOT RECOMMENDING. use ngrok instead. Better for 800% that this

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Simple Port Forwarding
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Design|Price|Pricing|Ssh|Not working|Fake

socketify.py Reviews

We have no reviews of socketify.py yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Portmap.io seems to be a lot more popular than socketify.py. While we know about 34 links to Portmap.io, we've tracked only 2 mentions of socketify.py. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portmap.io mentions (34)

  • How do hackers hide their ip in reverse shells?
    I once used portmap.io for reverse shell in ethical hacking classes. Source: about 3 years ago
  • OpenVPNnot working and i dont know what to do
    So I use portmap.io for OpenVPN like I saw in tutorials but I found out it is not working because my ip didn't change when I looked up what my ip was. Source: about 3 years ago
  • SSH into a personal computer in Jio Network using public IP
    I have a personal computer in the Jio Network at my home and I want to access it using ssh from another network. But in order to port forward my router I am stuck since Jio uses CGNAT if I am not mistaken and there is no use if I portforward. What other solutions do I have? I tried using portmap.io but I couldnt configure ssh in it (I dont want to use openVPN) so what other options do I have? Source: almost 4 years ago
  • port forwarding/tunneling
    I'm basically looking for a free version of https://portmap.io/ -- they will do this, but custom domains are $4/month. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • port triggering to replace port forwarding
    I would recommend trying again with port forwarding, or some other solution like this: https://portmap.io/ which is a kind of reverse tunnel made for situations like yours. That site has a free tier which allows a single forward. Source: almost 4 years ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Portmap.io and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.