pnpm VS Open-Registry

Open-Registry

JavaScript Package Registry funded, developed and maintained by the community, for the community

Landing page //
2022-03-23

Landing page //
2020-03-31

Why I stopped using NPM for PNPM And You should too! | #CodingPhase

Open-Registry videos

No Open-Registry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pnpm and Open-Registry)

Open-Registry

Package Manager

54 54%

Package Manager

46% 46

Front End Package Manager

61 61%

Front End Package Manager

39% 39

Code Collaboration

0 0%

Code Collaboration

100% 100

JS Build Tools

100 100%

JS Build Tools

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using pnpm and Open-Registry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pnpm seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pnpm mentions (3)

Don't trust anyone, not even update
Imagine npm but faster and it uses symlinks n stuff to reduce disk use and make node_modules not a huge nightmare Https://pnpm.js.org. Source: almost 3 years ago
Next.js TypeScript Template
Pnpm is a cool alternative to yarn or npm as it is faster and can reuse downloaded packages to reduce the size of node_modules. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
[Talk] Sharing Typescript Types between your Frontend and Backend
Lerna is great, as is pnpm (https://pnpm.js.org/) which we use at work. PNPM is a little faster, as it's sharing all the reused dependencies from a central location with symlinks, so it makes installing faster. Source: about 3 years ago